View Single Post
Old 07-31-2006, 03:44 PM   #69 (permalink)
Dylan
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Having a strong military is the correct thing to do. I firmly believe in peace through strength because history proves it works. The one thing these republicans today need to do more of is shrink the pet programs of theirs and the democrats also need to do that, but I think the dems have many more groups to answer to for votes than the republicans. I also don't really agree with Bush's giving federal money to religious charity organizations. Federal money comes with strings. The pork needs to be trimmed drastically on both sides.
"Peace through strength..." No. You can't have peace through strength. We need to achieve peace through money. One of my favorite journalists, Thomas Friedman, probably put it best when he said that no two countries containing a McDonalds have ever gone to war. Increased military spending on things like nukes, which can't fight terrorists who want to blow themselves up are pork. Military pork is still pork.
My political compass
Economic Left/Right: 5.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41