View Single Post
Old 08-16-2006, 04:15 PM   #26 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,872
Country:
Points: 28,457, Level: 99
Points: 28,457, Level: 99 Points: 28,457, Level: 99 Points: 28,457, Level: 99
Level up: 7%, 1,543 Points needed
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxian View Post
Why not just have states vote, and the value of each state's vote is based on the number of citizens and slaves in that state?
That is exactly what happened. Because of the electoral college each state got to represent not only the number of citizens but also the number of slaves. The answer is in your question. My question is how in the hell would they count those slave votes without the electoral college? I think it was a compromise the North would have made to remain united and at peace.

Of course they would have said it was because of X or Y. Who in the hell would want to come out and say "I support the electoral college because I am racist". Without the electoral college there would be no way to fairly allocate the votes the slaves represent.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.

Last edited by hevusa; 08-16-2006 at 04:21 PM.