 Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson  1. Did Saddam have - and use - WMDs in the past? THE ANSWER IS YES.
2. Did Saddam refuse to allow full and unfettered access to UN inspectors? THE ANSWER IS YES.
3. Did Saddam repeatedly refuse to abide by UN Resolutions? THE ANSWER IS YES.
Let's stop acting like Saddam was some innocent little fella that accidentally got caught in the crossfire. Everything Saddam got, he arrogantly brought on himself. | 1) Does the US have- and use- WMDs inthe past? YES
2) Has the US ever allowed full and unfettered access to UN inspectors. HELL NO
3) Has the US abided by all UN resolutions? OF course, since they made sure they vetoed anything ( inspite of world opinion ) that was against US interests. Which btw is why the UN has never been successful. YOu bitch about an impotent UN. Dammit you MADE it impotent by creating the 5 permanent members of the security council.
Does the above make you a terrorist nation?
The US has a spectacular history of only applying rules to OTHERS but not feeling bound by them.
Saddam was an evil man. No doubt. But the case that he was an immediate threat to you have quite clearly been proven wrong. NO WMDs, NO ALQAEDA LINKS, NO NOTHIN.
HOWEVER, any animosity that the US experiences in the world the US arrogantly brought on itself.
9/11 was awful. I saw the whole thing on tv and it fucked me up int he head. I have never seen that type of destruction in my life. BUT that is not the same as being surprised. tell me this.. do you think anybody in the world was surprised that many many many peole would like to kick the shit out of the US.
Does it surprise you that EVEN MORE people want to kick the shit out off the US after this outright breach of international law. "preemtive strike" .. what an unbelievable crock of shit. Maybe AQ was preemptively striking the US when they bombed the WTC. Cuz they knew the americans were comin to get them. See it doesn't sound at all fair when the pre-emptive strike is against YOU Love for all, Hatred for none |