Quote:
Originally Posted by hkbajwa Look there is no point in finding a link for you to deny. because that is what you will do. As you have invariably done every time somebody else posted a link.
I agree completely. But that quite clearly means that morality does not influence which nations the US considers allies. Basically it does not matter whether there is a bloodthirsty ruler leading a country. What matters is whether they like the US or not.
That justifies support of the saudi tyrant. Fair enough.. That's what you call realpolitik.
That is perfectly true. You DO live in america. But you can't have your cake and eat it too. If you wish to not consider what the rest of the world think, then by all means go ahead. In fact i know MANY countries who would breathe a sigh of relief if the US just butted out.
But on the other hand if your nation wishes to police the world, then it MUST consider what the rest of the world thinks of it. Otherwise it becomes what?? yeeees.. a TYRANT. And we all know americans don't like tyrants.
Hey dude i aint invading your country, OR putting undue pressure, OR threatening sanctions, OR supporting rebels in your country. I am merely stating certain opinions.
You are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT about the fact that the Pakis must fix their own problems before they try to get others to fix theirs. CLean your own house first.
But the same goes for the US. THe US is far from being a perfect nation ( other than in your collective imagination). There is too much intereference and bullying going on, and i am suggesting the US stop that before it shoots itself in the foot ( again).
BTW you know who gives the bearded crazies material to spread hatred? It's unjust actions committed by the US AND the ensuing arrogant rejection of criticism that proves the hate rhetoric RIGHT.
YOu know how the terrorists really are as bad as you say? YOu really are as bad as the terrorists say americans are.
Both parties are nuts | My country does not have schools run by religious idiots preaching hatred for other races or religions. Your's does. The middle east has been a breeding ground for terrorism long before Bush became president. How far back do you want to go?
Now as far as Saddam, I can only assume you have been proven wrong in your argument that Saddam had no terrorist connections since you have provided no counter point. So far, we have established that Saddam was a terrorist and supporting terrorism. We have established that the Middle East is the breeding ground for terrorism, not George Bush. We have established that there are muslims in your part of the world who wish to take over the world and murder others who will not bow to Allah. Those are the facts. Your attempt at trying to make America the fault for muslims who murder innocent people is not gonna work. Face reality. You're religion has a cancer and you will not address it. America is not to blame for your disease. |