View Single Post
Old 08-26-2006, 07:27 PM   #50 (permalink)
alias
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
But unfortunately for your argument, the science falls with Gore's arguments. But then again you'll probably call me a liar without actually checking the sources I gave before.

And inaccuracy doesn't mean bias. Wikipedia could be inaccurate, but I don't see how its article had a bias. If you're unsure about the validity of the wikipedia article, that is why they have sources at the bottom so you can check for yourself.
Inaccuracy on purpose means bias and that is what happens when you have an information site that can be accessed by anyone and everyone to edit. Just because it you get it from wikipedia means nothing. It might read different the next day.

The science does not fall with Gore's argument. The science community is divided. I check sources, lots of sources. I find sources that say there is global warming caused by man, sources that say global warming is a natural phenomenon as is global cooling, and sources that say there is no global warming caused by man. You seem to have a hard time with sources that dispute your sources. You think you're gonna "educate" me and then I'll come around to your way of thinking. Kinda arrogant on your part. Is that kinda like a dog trying to teach a human to bark?

Last edited by alias; 08-26-2006 at 07:29 PM.