Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life? Debate which position seems to be most morally correct.
View Single Post
Old 09-04-2006, 02:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
intangible child
Senator
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,662
Points: 23,734, Level: 94
Points: 23,734, Level: 94 Points: 23,734, Level: 94 Points: 23,734, Level: 94
Level up: 39%, 616 Points needed
Level up: 39% Level up: 39% Level up: 39%
Activity: 34%
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
intangible child is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peggy_Sue View Post
The people that prefer to call it 'pro-choice' might choose that term because it implies that opponents are 'anti-choice'. That isn't the case, though. The opponents to abortion might like people to see the reality that a choice is always available; the choice is made when people decide to have sex.

The people that prefer to call abortion opponents 'pro-life' may be implying, subliminally, that the other side is 'anti-life'. That isn't the case, necessarily.

The terms 'pro-abortion' and 'anti-abortion' must have gotten too much baggage over the years of social and political debate; the terms began to carry subconscious messages that people didn't like. For example, the word 'abortion' itself began to sound very harsh and it may have been easier to get people to support one side or the other if they could use a less graphic term to describe their positions. I can see why 'pro-life' was chosen to replace 'anti-abortion', because it describes the stance of abortion opponents regarding their thoughts about all human life and it shows they believe life begins 9 months before birth. I can also see why 'pro-choice' was chosen, though I think it is a bit misleading for the reason stated in the first paragraph.



I am definitely in favor of choice and I recognize the choice occurs when one decides to have sex. If the factors and risks associated with sexual activity are not considered before the act, that is a matter of personal responsibility (or irresponsibility, as the case may be).


I am definitely in favor of life. We all have something to offer this world and people around us. I don't think any one life is less important than another in terms of human absolute value


I'm in favor of people choosing for themselves whether they want to have sex and whether they want to risk having an unwanted pregnancy. I am obviously in favor of being as personally responsible as possible, especially when the outcome of an act turns into more than one hoped. There are people who would love to have a baby, but are unable. If a baby comes along unexpectedly, why take the life away from that baby for a matter of personal convenience? I've been told more than once that an abortion was chosen because the mother could not stand the thought of strangers raising her baby. I scratch my head each time and wonder WTF?
I highlighted in red your points, very observant of you, linguistics is the culprit! "compassionate conservative" is another, stop abortion and stop any financial aid!

There is placed in peoples minds that "the pill" is "evil" and any form of contraceptives are "evil" perhaps oral sex can solve the problem? People are going to have sex, no political party or banning of "sex" will ever accomplish anything! But possibly more perversions against children, (that can be avoided if sex is not made a political or religious crap shoot), that can be intimidated!

I'm the boss, my wife told me I can be, as long as I do what she says!
Live the Light, Give the Light,
Bring Heaven to Earth Every Day!


I am not a human being having a spiritual experience, I am a spiritual being having a human experience.

The ancient Greeks used to say, "You shall know a man by the friends that he keeps." Given the nature of their friends and advisers, what are we to conclude about the Republican party:
Stop the madness before us it stops!
Σταματήστε την τρέλα προτού να μας σταματήσεϊ Greek
Last edited by intangible child; 09-04-2006 at 02:46 AM.