View Single Post
Old 09-11-2006, 01:31 PM   #24 (permalink)
foundit66
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaaaman View Post
You are making faulty comparisons here founditt. There are just as many experts that state being 'gay' has nothing to do with genetics at all.
No. There aren't.
But feel to continue to talk on subjects you know nothing about...

The vast majority of the "experts" acknowledge a genetic link.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jaaaman
I have also read personal blogs of 'gay' people who state that feelings for the same sex and being 'gay' did not begin until later adolescence and adulthood.
The time-line of sexual attraction doesn't mean it isn't genetic.
Heterosexual men often find girls "icky" one day, and then attractive and something to be infatuated by the next.

Does that mean that heterosexuality is ALSO not genetic?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jaaaman
You are comparing apples to oranges. Being 'gay' and being 'black' are not synomynous with one another.
Do you understand what an "analogy" is?
It doesn't require the issues involved to be "synomynous"...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher