Ok .. I can understand the frustration at not being able to acatch an enemy because of "rules".

But of course these "rules" are also what allow you to define terrorists as criminals.

If you claim that war has no rules, then it would be about time for you to stop your moral outrage at terrorist methods.

THe ONLY thing differing you from terrorists is the supposed rules of engagement installed to make your war humane. It is what gives americans killing civilians "legitimacy". The second the rules of engagement are scrapped, so is the legitimacy of the war against terror.

I think alias' primitve bloodlust is clearly of the same caliber as the bearded crazies. I think that if anybody bases their actions on the actions of others, then you are evadind responsibility. Fact is that bombing a funeral procession is a lousy act. EVEN IF every one in the processionwere terrorists, it would STILL be a lousy act.

Now i dunno, but as far as i know, two wrongs do not make a right. But you are of course free to act in such a way... but spare us the righteousness