Originally Posted by hkbajwa

hahahahaha.. fine observation jefferson..

However, i stand by my opinion for two reasons:

1) A Gitmo lawyer is a more reliable source of information than an interview without specifics other than those that make all the inmates look like terrorists. That has been proven to be UNTRUE. Hence i consider that the report is also coloured with self justifications.

2) Even if is WAS wrong and these people really ARE all terrorists, then there should be no harm in allowing these men a fair trial. Evading scrutiny only speaks of insecurity about your own case. I mena what case could the government of the US have against those children who were 12, 13 and 15 when they got incarcerated.

I understand the need for security, but this is just rape of human rights.. Now you may say that they started it.. but last time i checked the "he started it" argument was only valid up until 5th grade. Just because certain people act like animals is no reason to imitate them.