I don't think he is a moron, I don't hate him and I do admit that I am sometimes bias. I do think he has made some bad mistakes and should be held accountable for them and this is part of the information that drives my bias. I have not seen any proof from you, and all the other Bush supporters, that shows he didn't have other information about Iraq and the actual terror threat. It has been in the news and all over the net, that he did in fact, have reason to doubt the source of the claim Saddam had a WMD program going(the spy was a nut case for one reason). It is also a verified fact, that he had other intelligence from the CIA pointing to the fact that there was no such program, which he choice not to share with Congress or the Senate before a vote was taken to go into Iraq. All facts. Why don't you admit that it is you who has already made up his mind that Bush did none of this simply because of your predetermined Love for Bush. Your writings, that debate my stance, smack of Neo-conservativism. I would suggest that you don't come up with wlid Neo-moronic theories like 'the Democrats are trying to divide this country', if you would like to be veiwed differently, by everyone here.