| Super Moderator  Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.) Gender:  Posts: 7,883 Country:  Points: 28,571, Level: 99 | Level up: 14%, 1,429 Points needed |  |  Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. |
Ever heard of satellites? Why are you guys so stuck on your ideology? Bush was wrong and lied to get support. It is terrible when people defend such immoral activities.
And you guys are probably the schmucks that pissed and moaned and wasted millions of dollars on a blowjob. Sad and pathetic. | Ever hear of camo? And i'm not sure what 'blowjob' you were referring to. |
So you are going against the UN inspectors word? And CIA officials with over 30 years experience.
You keep defending your ideology. I'll keep listening to those in the know that see past their noses. |