11-27-2006, 01:50 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Omaha Beach Posts: 7,298 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 | Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by digit As I said first of all - scientists who accept global warming were not predicting a stronger hurricane season due to global warming.
The strong 2006 hurricane season was predicted by scientists based on whatever methods they have been developing since before global warming theory even existed. Even global warming skeptics were predicting a strong 2006 hurricane season, so no the prediction for a strong 2006 season was certainly not based on global warming.
The hypothesis that a warmer world may contain stronger hurricanes was not used in 2006 season predictions. | Dumb much?
READ FROM THE ARTICLE: Quote:
On the other side are Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the most respected hurricane scientists in the world, a team of meteorologists from Georgia Tech led by Peter Webster, an MIT-educated monsoon specialist, and Greg Holland, who earned his doctorate at Colorado State under Mr. Gray.
"You cannot blame any single storm or even a single season on global warming. ... Gore's statement in the movie is that we can expect more storms like Katrina in a greenhouse-warmed world. I would agree with this," said Judith Curry. She is chairwoman of Georgia Tech's School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, and is co-author, with Mr. Webster, Mr. Holland and H.R. Chang, of a paper titled "Changes in Tropical Cyclones," in the Sept. 16 issue of Science, a weekly publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
| Catch that? I hope so! |