View Single Post
Old 01-24-2007, 01:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
huskylvr1
Citizen
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere in the "middle"
Gender: Female
Posts: 28
Points: 1,170, Level: 18
Points: 1,170, Level: 18 Points: 1,170, Level: 18 Points: 1,170, Level: 18
Level up: 70%, 30 Points needed
Level up: 70% Level up: 70% Level up: 70%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
huskylvr1 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Observer View Post
The fact hasn't been mentioned that one of "Tiller the Killer's" patients died after he performed an abortion for her at the request of her parents. So, what do we make of that? Is this another "safe" abortion?

Actually, this is why Kline was after Tiller. The girl in question (the one who died) had cerebral palsy. Obviously, it was not consensual sex...it was a rape. Kline still balks on releasing any "private information of his patients".

Now the State has spoken in the last election. They've chosen a man who will defend the Killer over the killed. Good job, Kansas!

While I don't like to speculate in these types of matters, I cannot help but wonder if the father of the girl was not the father of her baby. I'm sure it's crossed many minds. But, since Tiller seems to have someone in his pocket, we'll never know. He's above the law. Or so it appears.

How sad - I hope they are able to determine who took advantage of this young woman and give them what they deserve. I'm not normally a violent person but I have no tolerance for any one taking advantage of a disabled or handicap person. If she had cerebral palsy, it was a horrid situation either way. Most likely, carrying a child to term would have been impossible or extremely dangerous for her, the child or both. Likewise, performing a late term abortion is dangerous enough without the added risk of her condition. It sounds like a no-win situation for someone who had no say in what happened to her.