Originally Posted by Katczinsky

I can see by your screenname, that this response is predictable. It seems as if you're wrapped so far up in your own ego and complete anger toward liberals that you can't debate coherently (let alone write coherently). After deciphering the 'english' you wrote, I found out that I can't debate it, becauses its very premise is false. You claim that I believe everyone else should come before Americans, and then stem your entire argument of intolerance on that only point only to further go down a steep slipery slope that went completely off topic and into a tirade against liberalism. Well, too bad I never expressed that all others become before America.

Perhaps you should revisit the definition of unalienable and then come back to me. And notice that this word is intertwined in American history, foundation, and ideology.



Exactly; they're foreign nationals. Therefore our problem lies with the Mexican government. Enslaving them indefinitely for making a decision that other people are doing legally and would perhaps save the lives of their family is inhumane, but just deporting them won't be attacking the problem. Neither will putting up a wall. So our problem lies with the Mexican government. We have to put more obligation on them to prevent people from breaking their own laws, and the laws of other countries. Unfortunately the patronage-type relationship with the Bush administration and the Mexican is undermining this cause. The Bush administration doesn't want to hurt this relationship because this relationship is imperative to the Bush administration and the interests of big business in developing the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) and further erasing of the borders in a possible North American Union. The Mexican government, in fact, is one of their only friends in the Americas in the establishment of the FTAA.



Our economy is ran on the labor of these illegal immigrants. If they were all deported or rounded up in camps, our economy would suffer significantly. That is hardly looking out for the best interests of the economy. I agree, however, that there is an annual overabundance in this 'exodus' to the north. But rounding people up in camps, or putting up large walls won't be attacking the problem. We need to attack directly the causes of this exodus, namingly we need to help (if at all possible) the economy of Mexico, and we need to petition to the Mexican government to better uphold respect for the laws of other nations and the laws of their own nation.

Punishing the people who were driven to despiration, or are already in inhumane conditions isn't the answer.