Quote:
Originally Posted by cw3adkins I'm sorry, but i don't believe that you can read "you can't actually tell what they really wanted; all you are reading is the bold print and nothing else. if 55% of the vote was counted and for bush and 70% was uncounted and against bush." i said if; talking in a general and theoretical statement, i guess you missed that | Link?
You're making stupid claims you cannot verify. And yes, it's stupid. If the majority of the military votes counted were FOR Bush, what in sam hill leads you to believe that the ones that weren't counted were all AGAINST Bush. That's just stupid.
So... again... LINK? |