Thread: Bush to run for a third term
View Single Post
Old 02-06-2007, 01:21 PM   #97 (permalink)
Katczinsky
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,758
Country:
Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Level up: 78%, 114 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
Good lord, what is so hard for you liberals to understand about this?

The MAJORITY of military personnel DID vote for Bush. I did NOT say that ALL military personnel voted for him. I said a MAJORITY. And the last time I checked, 55% was a majority - but maybe not the way they teach "new math" at Ohio State.

And Sarge brings up an extremely important point: It was the DEMOCRATS who were fighting against allowing the absentee military ballots to be counted. Why do you suppose that was? (Hint - it's because they know how the majority of military votes go).

And as for cw3adkins... His opinions are pretty much like my butt-hole. They stink.
Wow. I never said you claimed that all of the military voted for Bush. I was pointing out that you were countering cw3adkins' point that the military as a whole is generally against Bush. Thus, you're attempting to prove that the majority of the military is for Bush. I was illustrating the fact that the vote count isn't the majority, as many votes weren't accounted for, and not everyone voted.

It's the majority of the votes counted, NOT the majority of the military. How is this so difficult for you to understand?
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72