View Single Post
Old 02-08-2007, 05:47 PM   #79 (permalink)
Antithesis
Council Member
 
Antithesis's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The great, dead heart of suburbia
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,537
Country:
Points: 6,756, Level: 54
Points: 6,756, Level: 54 Points: 6,756, Level: 54 Points: 6,756, Level: 54
Level up: 3%, 194 Points needed
Level up: 3% Level up: 3% Level up: 3%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Antithesis is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
You're only posting PART of the VAST array of medical evidence on the subject.

ALSO, you're refusing to answer a simple question: Do you defend the actions of somebody who knowingly lies to the American Red Cross, and puts vulnerable, innocent people at unnecessary risk?

Yes or No.

Do you defend that behavior?
I am posting a general consensus by various reliable sources (the CDC, for example, which is charged with knowing the truth about disease). Because they are reliable, I consider them truthful.

And in response to your question, which is, by the way, prejudiced for the sake of your case, yes, I defend his actions because people have a far greater chance of having their life saved than being infected when it comes to his blood, but I do not believe he was putting lives at risk.
"Every time I hear the phrase 'Christian nation' I run to my car and blast a Slayer album at full volume." - Me