Thread: More Evidence of Media "President-Making"
View Single Post
Old 02-14-2007, 05:22 PM   #55 (permalink)
sgtdmski
The Man You Love to Hate
Premium Member
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Country:
Points: 7,493, Level: 57
Points: 7,493, Level: 57 Points: 7,493, Level: 57 Points: 7,493, Level: 57
Level up: 72%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 72% Level up: 72% Level up: 72%
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
sgtdmski is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
I have poor judgment because I don't infer a large liberal media conspiracy out of the single fact that more reporters showed up to a a presidential announcement of a more well-known person?

Do you have anything to to contribute to this debate other than patronizing and making large rash presumptions?
Let us see, a more well-known person, a freshman Senator or a two-term governor.

Yeah I can see how a Senator who has served less than half of his first term has more name recongition than a former two-term governor. Great reasoning, but the fact remains that every poll taken by the Pew Center has shown that clearly over 80% of reporters at all levels vote what? DEMOCRAT.

dmk
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-