| Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256  Why is it that a pre-human can get such special rights but someone who is already born is fucked? | Because that someone (who is already born) DID SOMETHING to deserve to die. What did the UNBORN baby do to DESERVE death?? Besides interfere with his irresponsible parents convenience? Quote: |
It seems to me that most pro-lifers are also pro-death penalty, and also against any sort of social healthcare, or welfare or anything that helps REAL people. Until a baby is born, it is my contention that it is a parasite.
| Key words "my contention". It is NOT a "parasite". It is as yet UNborn human baby. Quote: |
Which sounds cold, and maybe even deragatory, but it is neither. It is simply a statement of the fact that the baby can not live on it's own,
| Neither can a newborn baby live on it's own. Now what? You should have the right to kill all children who aren't able to live without the assistance of another? Quote: |
and is subject to the will of the mother. The mother has the right to do with her body as she chooses,
| With her body, not the body of her own unborn baby. She had the right NOT to get pregnant, didn't she? What did she do to get that way? She CHOSE to have sex. Now she needs to live with the consequences. If she didn't want a pregnancy, she should have chosen (i.e., her right to her body) to use protection or abstain. She irresponsibly did NOT make the right choice when she decided to have sex. Killing an unborn baby after the fact (of her irresponsibility) is unacceptable. Quote: |
and if she chooses to not share it with another creature, I see it as no more damning than being de-wormed.
| Key words, "I see it as....." In other words, it's only your VIEWPOINT.
Actually the baby is not a part of her body as a wart or tumor. In many cases, the fetus doesn't even have the same blood type as it's mother. So how can you believe it's a parasite....like worms. Indeed! 
Last edited by Observer; 02-15-2007 at 04:19 PM.
|