View Single Post
Old 02-16-2007, 05:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
sgtdmski
The Man You Love to Hate
Premium Member
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,954
Country:
Points: 7,642, Level: 58
Points: 7,642, Level: 58 Points: 7,642, Level: 58 Points: 7,642, Level: 58
Level up: 46%, 108 Points needed
Level up: 46% Level up: 46% Level up: 46%
Activity: 16%
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
sgtdmski is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Oh yes, the House with another non-binding resolution. This is just a grandstand for House Democrats to attack the President. A non-binding resolution has the weight of nothing, it is not a law, just a statement.

Now correct me if I am wrong, but throughout the campaign the Democrats attacked the stay the course philosophy that President Bush declared. Now the President is seeking to increase troop strength, something else the Democrats mentioned, and in their non-binding resolution they are attacking this strategy and instead maintaining the stay the course philosophy of before the election.

So let's see if we can all follow this folks, this resolution will not prevent the deployment of 1 single troop, nor will it require the return of 1 single troop from in Iraq. In other words, it does not a damn thing.

Now when you say one thing and then do another they have a word for that, so somebody please help me out with that. The two that come to my mind most immediately are hypocrite and liar.

dmk
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-