View Single Post
Old 02-22-2007, 07:41 AM   #118 (permalink)
baloney_detector
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,264
Country:
Points: 7,372, Level: 57
Points: 7,372, Level: 57 Points: 7,372, Level: 57 Points: 7,372, Level: 57
Level up: 11%, 178 Points needed
Level up: 11% Level up: 11% Level up: 11%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
baloney_detector is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
I notice that you keep spinning out of control, trying to explain why all these studies - linking abortion to breast cancer - just CANNOT BE RIGHT! THEY CAN'T BE!
The problem with "all of these studies", at least a good number of them, is that they rely heavily on people telling the truth.

Simply put, a case-control study is inherently biased.

And furthermore, because of this fact, some conclusion that women are 30% more at risk for developing breast cancer for WHATEVER reason is bound to be a smaller change from the norm than the error in measurement of the type of study used.

In short, this 30% greater at risk concluson is a useless conclusion because its the equivalent of saying that women are 30% at greater risk for developing breast cancer after an induced abortion...+/- 50% based on the measurement error of the study.

Find a study with less inherent measurement error to find a correlation between the two to demonstrate a link between induced abortion and breast cancer...and then you might have something realistic to talk about.