View Single Post
Old 07-21-2005, 08:43 PM   #113 (permalink)
Nebraskaboy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Nebraskaboy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,612
Points: 7,425, Level: 57
Points: 7,425, Level: 57 Points: 7,425, Level: 57 Points: 7,425, Level: 57
Level up: 38%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nebraskaboy is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewnoise
Here are two advantages.

1. You ensure that innocent people don't get killed.

2. You free up the courts to deal with other cases.
And you get to flip the bill to keep these people alive....


How would you feel about at least putting them to hard labor? With the emphasis on HARD...
The prisions are already getting very over crowded, which is why so MANY new prisions are going up. So these new prisions along with more guards is going to hit our tax dollars pretty hard also right? So money wise, this is also a argument for capital punishment but I could be completely wrong. I just want to see your views on this.
W00t! We Agree again! Hooyah!
Alright, I'm doing pretty good today.
Godbless, Tadpole.

“I am a Republican. I\'m loyal to the party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. And I believe that my party, in some ways, has strayed from those principles, particularly on the issue of fiscal discipline.”

-John McCain

"Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution.
You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."

-Jamie Raskin