View Single Post
Old 03-01-2007, 12:30 PM   #47 (permalink)
policy chick
Council Member
 
policy chick's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,106
Points: 3,727, Level: 38
Points: 3,727, Level: 38 Points: 3,727, Level: 38 Points: 3,727, Level: 38
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to policy chick Send a message via MSN to policy chick
policy chick is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkbajwa View Post
Well dude considering that i was almost brought to tears sitting thousands of miles away i can only imagine how you felt.

However i am interested.. What is justice in this situation.. Revenge or Resolution?

Unfortunately in cannot be both as revenge only leads to greater revenge. In the sense that if you exact revenge for an action, then the other side invariably feel entitled to THEIR revenge. Besides this 9/11 action in itself is considered a REVENGE acion by those who supported this atrocity. (so we kinda wind up in a chicken and egg argument )

But my question still stands. What would be adequate justice in this situation.

I ask this question because i am not sure that this has been answered more than extremely vaguely since the happening.
I wish revenge was available. But the only way to go is conflict resolution.
"An intellectual is going to have doubts, for example, about a fundamentalist religious doctrine that admits no doubt, about an imposed political system that allows no doubt, about a perfect aesthetic that has no room for doubt." ~ Antonio Tabucchi