View Single Post
Old 03-16-2007, 09:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
baloney_detector
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Country:
Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
baloney_detector is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaaaman View Post
No... the article clearly states that the sun is responsible for the global warming, as greenhouse ozone and aerosols have thinned significantly and have allowed more sunlight in to warm the earths surface.
From the article:

"The thinning of Earth’s “sunscreen” of aerosols since the early 1990s could have given an extra push to the rise in global surface temperatures."

Now, where exactly in this citation (or elsewhere in this article) does NASA say-or even imply-that the reduction in Earth's aerosols is the SOLE reason why our planet is warming...which is what your added headline (conclusion) implies?

(Hint - It doesn't...because greenhouse gases are ALSO a forcing factor in the Earth's surface temperature. If CO2 and other gases didn't ACT as greenhouse gases, then why should they be called "greenhouse gases" in the first place?)