 Quote:
Originally Posted by billybobama  I have yet to see 1 question from your posts. | In my post I asked:
What is your definition of this word and how are my statements rhetoric?
Isn't it only rhetoric(I am assuming your definiton of rhetoric) because it directly opposes your political alignment?
Yet to see, or conviniently avoided? Quote:
Originally Posted by billybobama But let's talk about the real world. We live with a 2 party system, at this time, you choose one or the other or you 1) Waste your vote. 2) Get someone elected who should not be. Your fantasy land does not exist at this time. | I was pointing out that the Progessive Democrats going to be supplying a third alterative to the traditional 2 party picks. Had you listened you would know this. Quote:
Originally Posted by billybobama No matter how much rhetoric you throw at it. | Here is the post you claimed was rhetoric. Quote: |
Originally Posted by tyreay Sorry, but the Dems are not much better.
I have been interested in the Progessive Democrats of America(for the reform of the Democratic Party), who will are planning to vote among it's members, to support a candidate. | ---
And I supplied a link. This is what you are suppose to do. It is not rhetoric. I upset you because I said: Quote: |
Originally Posted by tyreay Sorry, but the Dems are not much better. | I don't think any party whos decisions are governed by lobbyists is as honest as you would like us to believe. Just get over it and move on. Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour
There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville |