Thread: Free Speech Case at Supreme Court
View Single Post
Old 03-19-2007, 09:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
baloney_detector
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Country:
Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 10%
Activity: 10% Activity: 10% Activity: 10%
baloney_detector is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sear View Post
It is precisely unpopular, and offensive speech which need 1st Amendment protection.
"The only freedom which counts is the freedom to do what some other people think to be wrong. There is no point in demanding freedom to do that which all will applaud. All the so-called liberties or rights are things which have to be asserted against others who claim that if such things are to be allowed their own rights are infringed or their own liberties threatened. This is always true, even when we speak of the freedom to worship, of the right of free speech or association, or of public assembly. If we are to allow freedoms at all there will constantly be complaints that either the liberty itself or the way in which it is exercised is being abused, and, if it is a genuine freedom, these complaints will often be justified. There is no way of having a free society in which there is not abuse. Abuse is the very hallmark of liberty."


Lord Hailsham, former Chief Justice (UK)
"The Dilemma of Democracy"