Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightrider Originally posted by RidinHighSpeeds:
On the contrary, I personally believe that Bush has done a good job keeping the fascist jihadists at bay. Look at his record: there have been no major terrorist attacks on US soil since Sept. 11, 2001. . .
Now, as far as a successor to Bush - I think that Rudy Giuliani would be a fine choice. In Giuliani, we have the ideal candidate: someone who will be tough on terror as well as compassionate on certain social issues.
Also, Giuliani is real and down to earth - what you see is what you get. It's refreshing that we have a candidate running for office that fits into that category. Doesn't everyone agree?
As far as Romney goes, I just don't think that he has the clout to beat Hillary. . . and we all know that is not a good thing. . .  | The terrorists are patient planners. The fact that there has been no attack on US soil is NOT a good criterion.
I lived in NYC during part of Guliani's administration. He is more about apprearances than actual work. For example: Everyone compliments him about getting the agressive panhandlers out of Times Square. What he did was pushed them into less affluent areas and then ignored the complaints of the citizens that lived there. I couldn't see a much worse option for our country than a person like that. |