Thread: Board says
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2007, 10:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
knot_e_lady
Congressional Representative
 
knot_e_lady's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,271
Country:
Points: 12,095, Level: 72
Points: 12,095, Level: 72 Points: 12,095, Level: 72 Points: 12,095, Level: 72
Level up: 12%, 355 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 16%
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
knot_e_lady is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacherman View Post
I did have the 2 confused. Mmm Im reckon not. Though I do think pharmacits should be able to operate according to there conscience.
And the ruling says that they can have another pharmacist fill the order if there is someone else there.

But they are NOT allowed to deny a patient prescribed drugs simply because of their own moral feelings. There have even been cases of pharmacists not filling the prescription, and actually DESTROYING the prescription so the patient can't get it filled ANYWHERE.

If they have a problem with it, then perhaps they should work elsewhere where they won't have to make those kind of decisions.