Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Abortion

Abortion How do you feel about abortion? Are you pro-choice or pro-life? Defend your views on abortion in this forum.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2007, 02:52 AM   #141 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,164
Country:
Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Level up: 73%, 55 Points needed
Level up: 73% Level up: 73% Level up: 73%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
baloney_detector is offline
 
There are clearly two separate legal issues here:

1) Does the father have the right, by means of enforcement by the state, to force a woman to carry his child to term or abort it?

(If the state cannot force a woman to carry a father's child to term, at least under a certain set of conditions, then a father certainly doesn't have the right to force a woman to carry a father's child to term, again under a certain set of conditions.)

2) Does either the father or the mother (or both) have the right, by means of enforcement by the state, to deprive their child of the support he or she needs after birth?

(Evidently, it is in the state's interest that all children have the support of their parents...or others who are legally assigned to that duty.)

Thus, anyone who seeks to argue about these two separate issues as if they are one issue is ignorant of the actual views of the state.

And, anyone that says the father has the right to legally control the outcome of a mother's pregnancy would automatically have to conclude that it is really the state, rather than the father, who has the legal ability to control the outcome of a mother's pregnancy.
Sponsored Links
Old 07-24-2007, 07:07 AM   #142 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
knot_e_lady's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,193
Country:
Points: 10,997, Level: 69
Points: 10,997, Level: 69 Points: 10,997, Level: 69 Points: 10,997, Level: 69
Level up: 37%, 253 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
knot_e_lady is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by forester814 View Post

Is that true? I've never heard that before.
(Then again, I've never had a reason to look into it, either.)
Maybe this is something that varies state to state?

What a tragedy if it is true. Yet another instance where our current health care and insurance system is failing those that need it most.
Yes, it's true. At least in California it is.

I was not married to my 'ex' with my first 3 sons. We had been living together for 7 years, though. For Zack, the youngest of the three, I was at the time out of work. Because his insurance wouldn't cover us, I had to have the pregnancy and delivery under Medicaid.
Old 07-24-2007, 08:20 AM   #143 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,853
Country:
Points: 54,425, Level: 100
Points: 54,425, Level: 100 Points: 54,425, Level: 100 Points: 54,425, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Even simpler - when a woman gets pregnant without any participation from a man - then she gets to decide.

Until then she should be required to get the fathers approval before killing his baby
I have to agree with AG. You can't force a woman to bring this thing to term. 9 months + recovery time... That could cost you a job... I say if you want men to be able to participate so badly, we develop a way that men who so desperately want these kids can have a womb surgically implanted, and the men can endure the pregnancy... I have a feeling there won't be many men lining up for the procedure. It's real easy for a man to want a woman to have the child, he's not the one who has to endure it.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 07-24-2007, 08:22 AM   #144 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,853
Country:
Points: 54,425, Level: 100
Points: 54,425, Level: 100 Points: 54,425, Level: 100 Points: 54,425, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
So the moment she becomes pregnant, her body becomes HIS property?

What happens if he forces her to continue the pregnancy and it leaves her permanently disabled? Will he be required to support her?

His baby? It's her baby too. And her body. Two out of three gives you a majority. Why should the minority vote win?
Exactly...

I would also say what do you do when these fathers who insist the baby be borne then refuse to support the child and leave it and the mother alone...

Real easy to make a decision when you need not deal with the consequences...
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 07-24-2007, 09:19 PM   #145 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,897
Country:
Points: 15,165, Level: 79
Points: 15,165, Level: 79 Points: 15,165, Level: 79 Points: 15,165, Level: 79
Level up: 63%, 185 Points needed
Level up: 63% Level up: 63% Level up: 63%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
tyreay is offline
 
Reopened. Bump.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
Old 07-25-2007, 10:04 AM   #146 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,240
Country:
Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Level up: 91%, 19 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Catus Felidae is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256 View Post
Exactly...

I would also say what do you do when these fathers who insist the baby be borne then refuse to support the child and leave it and the mother alone...

Real easy to make a decision when you need not deal with the consequences...

A lot of people think that the legislature can just pass any old law it wants, and all is fine. Laws get tossed by the courts all the time. For being too vague, contradicting other laws already in existence, and certainly for being unconstitutional. A law of this nature is a direct violation of the fourth and thirteenth amendments.

Where is the money to enforce this law going to come from? That must be specified as well. Can you imagine the tax increase necessary just for the extra judges that would be needed!


Old 07-25-2007, 10:11 AM   #147 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,164
Country:
Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Level up: 73%, 55 Points needed
Level up: 73% Level up: 73% Level up: 73%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
baloney_detector is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
A lot of people think that the legislature can just pass any old law it wants, and all is fine. Laws get tossed by the courts all the time. For being too vague, contradicting other laws already in existence, and certainly for being unconstitutional. A law of this nature is a direct violation of the fourth and thirteenth amendments.

Where is the money to enforce this law going to come from? That must be specified as well. Can you imagine the tax increase necessary just for the extra judges that would be needed!
I just wonder how a father could legally force a pregnant women to carry a child to term if the state couldn't do the same thing.

(Welcome Cat! Long time, no see. )
Old 07-25-2007, 10:20 AM   #148 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,240
Country:
Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Level up: 91%, 19 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Catus Felidae is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector View Post
I just wonder how a father could legally force a pregnant women to carry a child to term if the state couldn't do the same thing.

(Welcome Cat! Long time, no see. )
That's just it Baloney, he can't. The only way you could make this law work, is to make becoming pregnant a crime for all women.


Nice to see you again.
Old 07-25-2007, 10:32 AM   #149 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,164
Country:
Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48 Points: 5,695, Level: 48
Level up: 73%, 55 Points needed
Level up: 73% Level up: 73% Level up: 73%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
baloney_detector is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
That's just it Baloney, he can't. The only way you could make this law work, is to make becoming pregnant a crime for all women.


Nice to see you again.
I'd say that it would be the state, rather than the father, who, in theory, would have the right to force a woman to carry a child to term since laws are written in the interest of the state, rather than in the interest of the people...at least in the US.


(I hope you have been well.)
Old 07-25-2007, 10:41 AM   #150 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,240
Country:
Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48 Points: 5,731, Level: 48
Level up: 91%, 19 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Catus Felidae is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector View Post
I'd say that it would be the state, rather than the father, who, in theory, would have the right to force a woman to carry a child to term since laws are written in the interest of the state, rather than in the interest of the people...at least in the US.


(I hope you have been well.)
True. In order for the state to pass a criminal law, it must have an interest in the situation. The SC has already ruled that the state doesn't have an interest in seeing that a child is born until the 6th month. Even then, it can only prohibit abortion. It can't control a womans otherwise legal behavior. So....the law would have to specify that this is a civil matter. But, they can't. Civil agreements that violate the law/constitution are void. So it would have to be a criminal matter. But you can't do that either. Laws aren't allowed to violate the constitution any more than civil agreements. So we're back to making it a civil matter. But we already know we can't, and I'm getting dizzy! Simply put, "that dog won't bark".

I've been well. Up to my butt in alligators as usual.
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites