Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Abortion

Abortion How do you feel about abortion? Are you pro-choice or pro-life? Defend your views on abortion in this forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2008, 11:59 AM   #61 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,033
Country:
Points: 51,378, Level: 100
Points: 51,378, Level: 100 Points: 51,378, Level: 100 Points: 51,378, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 95%
Activity: 95% Activity: 95% Activity: 95%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
thank you

I knew my post wasn't that far out in left field LOL

I have a feeling gracie was just trying to stir up the pot
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Sponsored Links
Old 01-03-2008, 12:07 PM   #62 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,329
Country:
Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Level up: 60%, 80 Points needed
Level up: 60% Level up: 60% Level up: 60%
Activity: 23%
Activity: 23% Activity: 23% Activity: 23%
Catus Felidae is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
thank you

I knew my post wasn't that far out in left field LOL

I have a feeling gracie was just trying to stir up the pot
Anytime.

To my mind, you can either allow both sides of an argument, or neither.

Anything else is censorship.
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:15 AM   #63 (permalink)
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,797
Country:
Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Level up: 63%, 111 Points needed
Level up: 63% Level up: 63% Level up: 63%
Activity: 25%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Grace is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
If you're going to spend the 'had abortion been legal, all these wonderful people might have been aborted' coin, then you have to allow for the opposite side to use the opposite side of that coin.
It has been allowed, It has also been exposed for being a sick point of view.

Quote:
If abortion had been legal and Ted Bundy had been aborted, just think how many women, and the children they would have had, would be alive today.
Ok, but if abortion was now illegal just think of how many millions of children and there children, would be alive today. I think that number is far greater than any who have been killed by a serial killer.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:16 AM   #64 (permalink)
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,797
Country:
Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Level up: 63%, 111 Points needed
Level up: 63% Level up: 63% Level up: 63%
Activity: 25%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Grace is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
Anytime.

To my mind, you can either allow both sides of an argument, or neither.

Anything else is censorship.

His argument was allowed. It was just a bad one.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:23 AM   #65 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,329
Country:
Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Level up: 60%, 80 Points needed
Level up: 60% Level up: 60% Level up: 60%
Activity: 23%
Activity: 23% Activity: 23% Activity: 23%
Catus Felidae is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace View Post
It has been allowed, It has also been exposed for being a sick point of view.

"sick" is a personal opinion. Personally, I feel that someone butting into someone else's reproductive decisions is pretty 'sick'.



Ok, but if abortion was now illegal just think of how many millions of children and there children, would be alive today. I think that number is far greater than any who have been killed by a serial killer.
One vote for overpopulation. Isn't that why China forces women to abort?
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:23 AM   #66 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,329
Country:
Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55 Points: 7,070, Level: 55
Level up: 60%, 80 Points needed
Level up: 60% Level up: 60% Level up: 60%
Activity: 23%
Activity: 23% Activity: 23% Activity: 23%
Catus Felidae is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace View Post
His argument was allowed. It was just a bad one.
As was yours.
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.
Old 01-04-2008, 01:42 PM   #67 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 368
Country:
Points: 2,276, Level: 28
Points: 2,276, Level: 28 Points: 2,276, Level: 28 Points: 2,276, Level: 28
Level up: 84%, 24 Points needed
Level up: 84% Level up: 84% Level up: 84%
Activity: 15%
Activity: 15% Activity: 15% Activity: 15%
Ralph is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
If you're going to spend the 'had abortion been legal, all these wonderful people might have been aborted' coin, then you have to allow for the opposite side to use the opposite side of that coin.

If abortion had been legal and Ted Bundy had been aborted, just think how many women, and the children they would have had, would be alive today.
It clearly would not have been 1.6 million per year. Just listen to the cognation to reason from the people that only support abortion on demand because they perceive it be a "core" issue of their political position. Does anyone really believe that an endangered animals life, no matter how close to extinction they my be, is worth comparing to a human life, simply because they have presented the absurd position that "humans" are not endangered or else they also might be protected? We are told everything that presents the unborn child as anything other than human. They have no cognation to reason, the cruel procedure does not hurt them because they are just a lump of cells with no feelings, they are legally defined as a non-living entity thus I feel no guilt, the womans body is her own body and thus the unborn is her property,.....the list goes on and on, women will still get the procedure even if it is illegal, we simply want to protect those women while killing over a million babies a year for social reasons.

DO ANY OF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THE ABSURD POSITIONS THAT MUST BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THE "LOUD MOUTHED" 5% OF OUR PARTY THAT THINKS THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE POLICY SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE POWER AND MONEY? Its time to stand up and have someone represent the middle class of our party that has roots there, that is not some "blue blood" limo-liberal who considers screwing with peoples lives as a "noble" cause, as the common "folk" are just to ignorant to decide for themselves. Slavery, clearly still exists in this nation, its masters simply wears another hat, or should I say "robe". The last "real" democrat that held the position of president, and asked the question "What can I do for my country, not what can my country do for me?", was in fact JFK. And apparently he was killed because he believed in a strong defense, lowering taxes when our nation was in the middle of a recession, family and God, and could not be led around by the nose. Where is the next democrat coming from that also believes in these things but also realizes that social issues must represented just not at the expense of our national security? JFK, no doubt in today's political atmosphere would be portrayed as an extreme conservative by the fringe powers that control the main stream media. There is still such as thing as a DEMOCRAT that believes in the constitution, family, God, the right of self protection and social programs that work for the people as something other than a "political" carrot. I KNOW, I AM ONE (R)

Last edited by Ralph; 01-04-2008 at 02:02 PM.
Old 01-04-2008, 02:10 PM   #68 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,809
Country:
Points: 35,052, Level: 100
Points: 35,052, Level: 100 Points: 35,052, Level: 100 Points: 35,052, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
One vote for overpopulation. Isn't that why China forces women to abort?
I've heard the opposite view that the 50m babies aborted since RvW are the missing generation and the cause of the imminent shortfall in social security contributions.
[IMG][/IMG]

Doggone it darn right you betcha bless your heart maverick
Old 01-04-2008, 08:38 PM   #69 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
OKgrannie's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 440
Country:
Points: 6,787, Level: 54
Points: 6,787, Level: 54 Points: 6,787, Level: 54 Points: 6,787, Level: 54
Level up: 19%, 163 Points needed
Level up: 19% Level up: 19% Level up: 19%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
OKgrannie is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace View Post
Ok, but if abortion was now illegal just think of how many millions of children and there children, would be alive today. I think that number is far greater than any who have been killed by a serial killer.
Criminalizing abortion doesn't affect the number of abortions performed. If abortion was illegal, therefore more dangerous for women, the same number of "babies" would still be dead, but a large number of women would also be dead.
The greatest danger to liberty lurks in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.

--Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
Old 01-05-2008, 05:17 AM   #70 (permalink)
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,797
Country:
Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64 Points: 9,239, Level: 64
Level up: 63%, 111 Points needed
Level up: 63% Level up: 63% Level up: 63%
Activity: 25%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Grace is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie View Post
Criminalizing abortion doesn't affect the number of abortions performed. If abortion was illegal, therefore more dangerous for women, the same number of "babies" would still be dead, but a large number of women would also be dead.

Thats rediculas. Sure there would still be women who felt the need to commit murder, but fear of breaking the law would stop most abortions, if it were illegal.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites