I posted this @ 9:40 and you replied @ 9:41. I would be inclined to think that you didn't bother to read the article.

If you like, I can locate the scientific paper published after they used two ova to create a viable, reproductive female mouse, but what would be the point if you won't even read a simple article such as that one?

If you'd like, I can re-read it and ask you if that was the Chinese "cloner" who was found to be a complete fraud.


And quite frankly, the idea that you can compare cloned mice to unborn humans is, at best, stupid.

But do keep encouraging people to butcher babies - just because they can!

wow
jefferson has included everybody else in his usual description of me

I feel as if I'm in good company

You are the one that said that is was a good thing that OD wan't pro-choice when she was pregnant.

I've been pro-choice since I've been old enough to understand and make a judgement about what that meant. Never affected my pregnancies at all.

If you want to debate points, offer an arguement instead of an attack.

An embryo is no more a baby than an acorn is an oak tree.

Argument? What a crock!

YOU are the one who is FOR killing babies - not me.

YOU are the one who really needs to come up with legitimate reasons why it's okay to butcher babies - and saying that they're not people isn't adequate. Science proves they are.

I believe you have a seared conscience and are so depraved that you actually believe this crap. Evidence of this is that you'll actually compare babies to acorns. Do you actually believe the crap you're saying?

Not-until-the-sperm-unites-with-the-ova-does-it-become-life. Why is it so hard for you people to fathom? Why must you distort the issue? Because it muddies the water, that's why.

You're not muddying it for me or any others who have comprehensional abilities. All you do prove is how disingenuous you can get to protect your agenda.

You know what?

I decided I WOULD post some pictures of aborted/butchered babies for you depraved Pro-Abortionists.

Enjoy looking at these "fetuses" - or whatever you want to call them in order to salve your seared consciences!



*pics removed*





Anybody hungry yet?
Any of you pro-abortionists still enjoying your caviar?

Alright, Jefferson, get a grip. Please stop the hysterics.

I will lay out my arguement for you:

In the early stages of pregnancy, the embryo is little more than a cluster of cells.

These cells, although human, so not comprise a person.

Al this point the host female should have the right to decide if she wishes to continue to act as host, knowing that this pregnancy will be a drain on her resources.


If you have a debating point, please state it. I am perfectly willing to discuss points with you.

We have already found a way by which female mice can breed-with our help-without the aid of male mice sperm.

And the extrapolation to humans shouldn't be that far off into the future given our relatedness to mice.

And natural parthenogenesis already exists within a number of species, such as in some lizards, bees, and turkeys.

So, do you really think we won't find a way for parthenogenesis to work within Humankind?

Hysterics? I'd imagine the babies you're all for killing would scream IF THEY COULD.

A baby is, at conception, a human being. If you pro-abortionists will simply keep your murderous instruments away from it, it will be born - as it should be.


And let's stop they nonsense about how abortion is a woman's only choice. That's an absolute LIE. 99+% of all abortions are NOTHING more than convenience. Period.

More killing, anyone?