No way buddy, these bunnies are in my sights....and both need a good rump spanking at my hands, LOLX3

Take it, that reading comprehension isn't your specialty? The link you've quote in my response, is from the very source your OT claims about their 'numbers' being lower.

It states clearly who the source is...The ICRC itself...Or if you have trouble understanding anagrams...The International Committee of the Red Cross...You know, the ones your OT says they got their numbers from?

Or is it, you don't understand the term 'straight from the horse's mouth'? Which means, the organization itself, that your OT is supposed to be getting their numbers from?

The Red Cross though, doesn't support your OT's claims...In fact, they deny your claims.

Furthermore, Red Cross goes as far as to explain WHY they never gave exact numbers of the death of Jews in the camps, cause of how that would further eliminate their ability to help the Jews when approaching the Nazis...

Yet, they do provide one instance of just how high the count was by providing a percentage of how many in Auschwitz were Jewish and died there...A number that is five times higher then the number your OT provides...Further proving that the claims made in your OT are falsefied.

Perhaps what you should have done, rather then immediately jumped to the conclusion that your OT was 'truthful'...You should have done what I did...Gone to the Red Cross, research THEIR ARCHIVES, to get to the truth instead...

Afterall, your claim is that the Red Cross provided said numbers for your OT...Yet that isn't what the Red Cross says themselves, in their own archives and written documents.

In this instance...The Red Cross's actual papers trump your OT's claims.

Oh...And my name is Alicorn, Alicorn's Prayer, or AP...It's not 'AlicP'...Try to remember that in the future please?

No. You are being rude, crude, obscene, and vulgar in order to be demeaning towards them both.

Even Garysher has better manners then you do. As vulgar as PN and FX can get about certain topics, even they speak respectfully towards us ladies on this forum.

Spoken like a true gentleman lol...

All I can say is... good luck buddy HAHAHA!

His luck....not so goood

No good hitting on me Ali I'm a happily married man

Looks like his luck has run out for now lol.

Yep, and in his classic style, he's whining all about it on his site...

I know that's why he does it...Cause he even hinted on his more recent post there that he was seeing how far he could push it here, to see how long before he was banned again...Seems he likes being a career ban-ee...So he has something to post about there. LOL!

He's also under the impression that for some reason Nutty (and others) would/should have been insulted by the term 'Mr. African American' and seen that as a racist slur...

Considering society is told to refer to black racial groups using the terms African Americans or Black American, instead of using derogitory uses of the 'N' word, 'Colored', 'Negro', or other euphanisms used towards their race in a derogitory manner.

Sorry there David...But African American or Black American is actually the appropriate and RESPECTFUL addressing to thier race and culture by non-black groups. Unless the individual themselves say otherwise.

And in this instance, we have to take our cue from Nutty, as it's only himself who can say whether or not what you said was derogitory towards him.

Since he didn't comment to your response...And I know he did read your comment because he was in this thread long after you posted that comment...it's safe to assume he found it appropriate and not worth responding to.

If that was your attempt at trying to slur/insult him...To try and get a rise out of him and others...It was a very poor attempt on your part and you failed miserably there. You were much more successful with your derogitory comments towards OD and WT.

Alison you have my respect. Very good post from both of you. This report is not ture, there is proof it was around 6 million.