If you are being subjected to any form of long term harassment, intimidation, vandalism, racism stalking, verbal abuse, or a targeted campaign of malicious gossip, the following information might be helpful:

UK Indymedia | Harassment - The New Redwatch

Some groups of people seem to be more at risk from this than others. The person who is responsible for this has strong connections with a group of paedophiles, so if you have a family, please take the following security measures.

1)Buy a cheap used laptop / desktop – almost any old computer will do, so there is no need to pay a lot. Use this to type letters, store your family photographs and other personal stuff. Keep all documents with your home address, location of your children's school etc. on this machine. Never use it on the internet.

2)Transfer all the private data from your internet computer to the used laptop / desktop and re-format the hard drive of the internet computer.

3)Install some decent security software on the internet computer (a firewall which 'stealths' your IP address would ideal).

Hope this helps.

you forgot...

4) put on tin foil hat while surfing the web.

The "Monitum" guy who posted the first message in this thread is a serious serial stalker, who has been harassing a certain individual for years, and who anonymously posts libelous information about this person - or who tries to be clever and links to other libelous information.

Sometimes, as in his post here, this stalker tries to be even more clever and so does not directly name his intended target - the victim of his own harassment - but instead gives links to items which do name his victim.

Notice how this stalker states - without any evidence - that "The person who is responsible for this has strong connections with a group of paedophiles..."

He then gives a link to an item - posted by him - which names the victim of his stalking.

So the person who is writing about harassment is actually harassing someone. Nice!

He's been posting the same stuff about the same person for years on forums all over the world, using a variety of usernames. All posted anonymously of course. How very heroic.

His latest paranoid wheeze is about a person hacking into the computers of disabled people and then harassing them.

He's been asked many times to debate these lies of his on the Islamic Awakening forum where the Muslim friends of the person he's stalking can reply to him in person. He's hasn't done so and we all know why.

He's been asked many times to give the Police incident number since he alleges he's reported claims of such hacking to the Police. He hasn't done so - because he hasn't got one and is a fantasist.

He gives no evidence whatsoever for any of his claims - only links to sites which make allegations without providing evidence.

Now, if the victim of user "Monitum"'s stalking and harassment really was as this stalker portrayed him in the above article, the stalker should be very, very, worried, due to one or more of the following:

1) The alleged "hacker" would using his so-called hacking skills find out the identity of the stalker (and probably already has done so), and then send some of his neo-nazi heavies round to have a word or two and offer some suitable advice.

2) The alleged "hacker" would get some of his Satanist chums and chumesses to put a Satanic curse on the stalker, bringing a debilitating iillness (at the very least) to the stalker and ensuring at the very least that the stalker suffers some serious "bad luck".

3) The alleged "hacker" would arrange, using his criminal contacts, for the stalker to have "an accident".

It took you two and a half months to come up with this response? And you joined DtT today just so you could post these two replies about Monitum, without even so much as an introduction post or any other contribution to this board?

Monitum's initial posting received exactly one sarcastic response from the members. His other thread was also met with derision and sarcasm. Monitum hasn't been back to this forum since the beginning of June.

It seems to me that if you went out of your way to find Monitum's post and reply to it - 10 weeks after it was posted - one has to wonder just who is the stalker and who is the stalkee...

I like the name "Pointyhat" though. Should've had an avatar along with it..

Sounds like the prosecutor and the judge needed to be more thorough with the jury. Juries could take any testimony the wrong way.

They talked to the jurors afterwards, and there clearly was some juror nullification. They felt that she egged him on, provoked him, and that while they weren't condoning his actions, they were not going to pop him without having a chance to pop her.