| Global Politics Debate US and International politics here. |
05-03-2007, 10:24 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender:
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 109
Thanked 385 Times in 194 Posts
Points: 10,008, Level: 66 | Level up: 67%, 42 Points needed | | I have a question Why do conservative pundits find it necessary to defend GW Bush?
It is clear he isn't a conservative, by any definition of the word. Aren't true conservatives for LESS government intrusion?
So, why? Why don't they just call a spade a spade, and say their boy isn't what they had hoped. In other words, why don't they just face the truth? |
| |
05-03-2007, 10:27 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: RI
Gender:
Posts: 2,909
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Points: 14,720, Level: 78 | Level up: 79%, 130 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady Why do conservative pundits find it necessary to defend GW Bush?
It is clear he isn't a conservative, by any definition of the word. Aren't true conservatives for LESS government intrusion?
So, why? Why don't they just call a spade a spade, and say their boy isn't what they had hoped. In other words, why don't they just face the truth? | I would say that the ones that defend him(in government) are actually Neo-conservatives and have thier hands in the till too.
__________________ Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville |
| |
05-03-2007, 10:35 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender:
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 109
Thanked 385 Times in 194 Posts
Points: 10,008, Level: 66 | Level up: 67%, 42 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay I would say that the ones that defend him(in government) are actually Neo-conservatives and have thier hands in the till too. | Possibly, but I was thinking more along the lines of conservative pundits, like Bill O'Reilly.
I was watching Bill Maher, and he had this woman on who is a conservative commentator. She seemed like a reasonably intelligent woman, but everytime it came around to GWB, she blindly defended him, even though what she was saying was clearly untrue.
Why? |
| |
05-03-2007, 10:38 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: RI
Gender:
Posts: 2,909
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Points: 14,720, Level: 78 | Level up: 79%, 130 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady Possibly, but I was thinking more along the lines of conservative pundits, like Bill O'Reilly.
I was watching Bill Maher, and he had this woman on who is a conservative commentator. She seemed like a reasonably intelligent woman, but everytime it came around to GWB, she blindly defended him, even though what she was saying was clearly untrue.
Why? | Thats a really good question! I think I'll pass and let someone with a less liberal view answer. 
__________________ Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville |
| |
05-03-2007, 10:58 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Community Leader
Country: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: New England Shoreline
Gender:
Posts: 866
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Level up: 45%, 122 Points needed | | Perhaps they feel like they still have to support him, as he is still the president and they are the ones who supported his election and reelection and they do not want to have to admit to their mistake as a collective whole.
I've noticed politicians never answer questions directly, they play around with words and skirt the issue when asked a question. I think it just points out that politicians, in general, are dishonest.
Fancy words and skirting issues goes back to the Constitution, in which slavery was never mentioned directly, which led to generations of Americans debating slavery, often violently, and led to our own Civil War.
__________________ Our Task must be to free ourselves... by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures, the whole of nature, and its beauty.
Albert Einstein
Hans Küng: "There will be peace on earth when there is peace among the world religions." |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |