Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Health Care

Health Care Debate and defend your thoughts on the current health care system. Compare and contrast the current health care system of the US to other countries.

View Poll Results: Do you agree with Bush's decision to veto the stem cell research bill?
Yes 2 8.00%
No 21 84.00%
Undecided 2 8.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2007, 02:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Nightrider's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 687
Points: 4,154, Level: 41
Points: 4,154, Level: 41 Points: 4,154, Level: 41 Points: 4,154, Level: 41
Level up: 2%, 196 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nightrider is offline
Reply With Quote
Thumbs down Bush Vetoes Stem Cell Bill
FOXNews.com - Bush Vetoes Stem Cell Research Bill - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

It's kind of funny.

I hate the Libertarians because they are against the War on Terror. . .

I hate the Democrats because they are against lower taxes. . .

NOW, I hate the Republicans because they veto bills like this that could possibly save millions of lives. . .

Maybe I should start my own party. . . say, the hate everyone party! lol

By the way, are there any takers on this latest Bush veto? Any comments are greatly appreciated.

Last edited by Nightrider; 06-20-2007 at 08:31 PM.
Sponsored Links
Old 06-20-2007, 02:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
Partisan
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 6,753
Points: 34,387, Level: 100
Points: 34,387, Level: 100 Points: 34,387, Level: 100 Points: 34,387, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 87%
Activity: 87% Activity: 87% Activity: 87%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
It is another STUPID, grand-standing act by a stupid, grand-standing president, which will - once again - cause many American deaths that possibly needn't happen.

He's far more interested in destroying the middle class of America than saving their lives.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
500.jpg
"know this is EXACTLY why people think you shouldnt have equal rights" 2/11/08 Grace
Old 06-20-2007, 02:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Nightrider's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 687
Points: 4,154, Level: 41
Points: 4,154, Level: 41 Points: 4,154, Level: 41 Points: 4,154, Level: 41
Level up: 2%, 196 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nightrider is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
It is another STUPID, grand-standing act by a stupid, grand-standing president, which will - once again - cause many American deaths that possibly needn't happen.

He's far more interested in destroying the middle class of America than saving their lives.
I agree with you, tristan. It was certainly a very stupid move on his part. His timing on matters like this is, let's just say, less than impeccable. . .

Last edited by Nightrider; 06-20-2007 at 02:50 PM. Reason: grammar
Old 06-20-2007, 02:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Hio
Moderator
 
Hio's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,830
Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Level up: 56%, 88 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Hio is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
It is another STUPID, grand-standing act by a stupid, grand-standing president, which will - once again - cause many American deaths that possibly needn't happen.

He's far more interested in destroying the middle class of America than saving their lives.
But you got to look at the other side of the arguement. Me myself I choose undecided because yes I do agree that this will help and prevent deathes in the future from the type of illness. But you basicly have to cause death to prevent death. I say that because you need to terminate a fetus to gain the stem cells. So to me it goes 50/50.
What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26}
Old 06-20-2007, 02:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Posts: 8,493
Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Level up: 77%, 231 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hio View Post
But you basicly have to cause death to prevent death. I say that because you need to terminate a fetus to gain the stem cells. So to me it goes 50/50.

--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 06-20-2007, 03:01 PM   #6 (permalink)
Hio
Moderator
 
Hio's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,830
Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Level up: 56%, 88 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Hio is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
Ooo Oooo Ooo ima take a page out of Gary's book here!
....
.....
"Typical response from the type of person you are"
Nah im just messing with ya hev.

I still stick to my views thats all. Im not agreeing with what Bush does nor am I disagreeing. Guess thats why im Indi :P
What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26}
Old 06-20-2007, 07:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Citizen
 
DBear's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 129
Points: 1,275, Level: 19
Points: 1,275, Level: 19 Points: 1,275, Level: 19 Points: 1,275, Level: 19
Level up: 75%, 25 Points needed
Level up: 75% Level up: 75% Level up: 75%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to DBear
DBear is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hio View Post
But you got to look at the other side of the arguement. Me myself I choose undecided because yes I do agree that this will help and prevent deathes in the future from the type of illness. But you basicly have to cause death to prevent death. I say that because you need to terminate a fetus to gain the stem cells. So to me it goes 50/50.
Unwanted embryos are dead anyway. Why let their deaths be in vain? Let them have a purpose to help others. Plus, don't think that the US is the only player in this area of research. Other countries will make advances in this area leaving the US far behind.
Old 06-20-2007, 07:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Partisan
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 6,753
Points: 34,387, Level: 100
Points: 34,387, Level: 100 Points: 34,387, Level: 100 Points: 34,387, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 87%
Activity: 87% Activity: 87% Activity: 87%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
DBear - this bill is not about using existing stem cell lines - it's about CREATING them, which does require the creation with the intent to kill it.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
500.jpg
"know this is EXACTLY why people think you shouldnt have equal rights" 2/11/08 Grace
Old 06-20-2007, 07:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,297, Level: 85
Points: 18,297, Level: 85 Points: 18,297, Level: 85 Points: 18,297, Level: 85
Level up: 90%, 53 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hio View Post
But you got to look at the other side of the arguement. Me myself I choose undecided because yes I do agree that this will help and prevent deathes in the future from the type of illness. But you basicly have to cause death to prevent death. I say that because you need to terminate a fetus to gain the stem cells. So to me it goes 50/50.
Um. Speaking of 50/50.

"In humans, the fetal stage is the from the end of the third month until birth"
define:fetus - Google Search

There is a LOT of stem cell research that can be done before the embryo reaches "fetus" stage.
In fact, the bill in question actually deals with EMBRYONIC stem cells.

CNN.com - Bush vetoes embryonic stem-cell bill - Sep 4, 2006
"The measure, which the House of Representatives passed in May 2005, allows couples who have had embryos frozen for fertility treatments to donate them to researchers rather than let them be destroyed. "

So let's be perfectly clear. These embryoes would have "died" anyways.
And unlike abortion, I have seen NO attempt to legally restrict fertility clinics which do have to regularly dispose of extra frozen embryos which are no longer wanted or desired.
We're talking about EMBRYOS here.

And if your definition of life starts at "conception", then so be it. I don't agree.
But the truth is that while some Americans have problems with fetuses being used in stem cell research, a majority of Americans WANT embryonic stem cell research.

I felt it important to draw the distinction because of your phrasing.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 06-20-2007, 07:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,297, Level: 85
Points: 18,297, Level: 85 Points: 18,297, Level: 85 Points: 18,297, Level: 85
Level up: 90%, 53 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
DBear - this bill is not about using existing stem cell lines - it's about CREATING them, which does require the creation with the intent to kill it.
The measure, which the House of Representatives passed in May 2005, allows couples who have had embryos frozen for fertility treatments to donate them to researchers rather than let them be destroyed.
....
In August 2001, Bush announced that his administration would allow federal funding only for research on about 60 stem-cell lines that existed at the time. Researchers have since found that many of those lines are contaminated and unusable for research.
CNN.com - Bush vetoes embryonic stem-cell bill - Sep 4, 2006


Also, let's be perfectly clear on what the phrase "stem cell lines" means in the first place.
5. What is a stem cell line?
A stem cell line is composed of a population of cells that can replicate themselves for long periods of time in vitro, meaning out of the body. These cell lines are grown in incubators with specialized growth factor-containing media, at a temperature and oxygen/carbon dioxide mixture resembling that found in the mammalian body.

Embryonic stem cell lines, both human and mouse, can be grown indefinitely in vitro if the correct conditions are met. Importantly, these cells continue to retain their ability to form different, specialized cell types once they are removed from the special conditions that keep them in an undifferentiated, or unspecialized, state.

A limited number of human embryonic stem cell lines have been approved for use by scientists receiving federal funds in the United States. In August 2001, President Bush mandated that if scientists were using federal funds, research could only be conducted on the cell lines that were already in existence, grown from fertilized eggs that were to be discarded at in vitro fertilization clinics.

This regulation stated that no additional human stem cell lines could be generated from additional blastocysts. In the long term, this will place severe restrictions on the scientific process in this field and will limit the ability of scientists to compare the potential of human embryonic stem cell lines for tissue repair, to that which can be accomplished from other sources, such as adult stem cells.
ISSCR :: Stem Cell Science : Frequently Asked Questions

We are talking about "stem cell lines" / stem cell samples that originate from the source DBear talked about.

Bush is effectively saying "Well, you've got X amount of toys that you have been playing with, and we're only going to fund you for that X amount of toys. If they break (contaminated), then that's tough..."
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites