Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Other Topics of Discussion > Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories Express your opinion on some alarming, intriguing, or even plain wacky theories.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2007, 07:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 53
Country:
Points: 1,886, Level: 25
Points: 1,886, Level: 25 Points: 1,886, Level: 25 Points: 1,886, Level: 25
Level up: 86%, 14 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
CB_Brooklyn is offline
Reply With Quote
Post Analysis of the New York Times FDNY Interviews. Who SAW and HEARD Planes?
Hot off the presses, a new article by Andrew Johnson:

"Going in Search of Planes in NYC"


For the first time, the WTC Task Force interviews of FDNY/EMS personnel undergo a full analysis to determine how many saw and/or heard planes, and where they were. The collection of data is scientific, and is admissible in a Court of Law.


Andrew Johnson appeared on Jim Fetzer's radio show on Oct 3, 2007 to discuss the report. An MP3 (commercials/music edited out) is available here: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/au...Oct%202007.mp3


Bellow are the first three paragraphs of the report. See this link for the full document: CheckTheEvidence.com - Going in Search of Planes in NYC



===========================================
As we continue to delve into what happened on Sept 11 2001, we seem to be uncovering more evidence that some very strange things were happening near and at the World Trade Center in New York City when the towers were destroyed.

A re-examination of videos of the plane crashes and both the actual destruction of the towers and the aftermath seems to strongly suggest or even prove that (a) unconventional weaponry destroyed the towers and (b) the stories of large planes hitting the towers are bogus. For (a) one can simply ask “Where did the building go?” (and no, it wasn’t “into the basements”). For (b) one can simply ask “How can a hollow tube made of light materials cut through multiple steel girders, with little or no deceleration?”

A repeated pondering of the answers to questions (a) and (b) can lead on to a re-examination of other data about 9/11. Such a re-examination of existing data was proposed by Attorney Jerry Leaphart, in September 2007. Jerry brought to our attention the accounts / “oral histories” as given by over 500 Emergency Service “First Responders” to the 9/11 Tragedy, as posted on the New York Times Website, at the link given below.
===========================================
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites