| ||||||
| Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 1,072
| It's about time one of the candidates said something about the massive power consolidation underway in the Bush administration. My only question is: why aren't ALL the candidates talking about this? Clinton considers giving up some powers - Yahoo! News NEW YORK - If elected president in 2008, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton would consider giving up some of the executive powers President Bush and Vice President Cheney have assumed since taking office. In an interview published Tuesday in Guardian America, a Web site run by the London-based Guardian newspaper, Clinton denounced the Bush Administration's push to concentrate more power in the White House as a "power grab" not supported by the Constitution. Asked if she would consider giving up some of those powers if she were president, Clinton replied, "Oh, absolutely ... I mean, that has to be part of the review that I undertake when I get to the White House, and I intend to do that." Since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Bush and Cheney have taken several steps to expand presidential authority and diminish the role of Congress and the federal judiciary. Among other things, they have pushed for warrantless wiretapping of terrorist suspects and the use of "signing statements" to justify ignoring or defying laws enacted by Congress. In the interview, Clinton noted that other presidents, including Abraham Lincoln, had taken on new presidential powers but had gone back to Congress later to ratify their actions. Bush and Cheney had taken a different course, she said. "There were a lot of actions which they took that were clearly beyond any power the Congress would have granted, or that in my view was inherent in the Constitution," Clinton said. "There were other actions they've taken which could have obtained Congressional authorization but they deliberately chose not to pursue it as a matter of principle." | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Leader ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 665
| forester814 posted: Quote:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Partisan ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,688
| Quote:
At least she has the moral fortitude to begin addressing the Constitutional transgressions of Messrs Bush and Cheney | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 1,072
| Quote:
Exactly! It would be very easy NOT to do this, and just quietly assume that the powers that now rest with (or were taken by) the Bush administration transfer to the next administration. And, if she is as smart as I think she is, she would quickly follow that up by making sure Congress draws up some new laws that would prevent this sort of power grab from happening again. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Leader ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 665
| Yeah, like that'll happen... | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Leader ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 665
| A letter to the Editor of the New York Times: Quote:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.












Linear Mode