| ||||||
| Philosophy Discuss and debate the philosophies of religion, issues of faith, free will and determinism, and theories of knowledge. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Block Captain ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 210 Country: ![]()
| Status quo: Is it natural or is it plastic? Status quo: Is it natural or is it plastic? National governments in the West have advanced from Monarchies to Republics. Societies have moved from rule by a monarchy aided by the aristocracy, to rule by a plutocracy subject only to ratification by the citizens of the republic. It seems that, like the poor, we constantly have with us a privileged class. Is it possible to organize a well functioning democracy that does not support a privileged class? Let me give you my definition of privileged class. Fifteen years ago there was a humorous saying about George Bush the elder, which went something like this, “George Bush was born on third base and thought he had hit a triple”. My definition of a privileged individual is one who was born on “third base”. Evidently many assume that the privileged classes are those who have higher IQs or some kind of natural endowment. I do not consider this to be privilege. The privileged are those who, by birth, are endowed with great wealth thereby being placed into a position of power and prestige without any meritorious effort on their part. Can a democratic society function effectively if no individuals are allowed to inherit great wealth? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.










Linear Mode