Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect
by
Judy Wood and John Hutchison Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect - index Excerpt:
=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.
These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.
The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as “The Hutchison Effect”. The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with “field effects” for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.
The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================
My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist.
It definitely DOES exist!
Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the
Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.
See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with
Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with
John Hutchison.
9/11 Issues
For proof that the
9/11 attacks, the
9/11 cover up, and the
9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with
directed energy weapons and the
media, see my new article:
9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline CheckTheEvidence.com - 9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart: Dr Judy Wood, suing on
behalf of the United States of America and demanding a
Trial by Jury, has evidence that
Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
Wood-Qui Tam Complaint Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on
behalf of the United States of America and demanding a
Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted
cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
Morgan Reynolds - No More Games • Net Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!
Even
Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was
fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!" Morgan Reynolds - No More Games • Net What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the
WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the
New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the
First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them.
But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:
Going in Search of Planes in NYC CheckTheEvidence.com - Going in Search of Planes in NYC What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are
NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are
not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...230806wtc7.jpg
See here for more:
Morgan Reynolds - No More Games • Net What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the
Washington Post two and a half years
before 9/11:
Washingtonpost.com: dot.mil
There were
NO hijackings on 9/11.
There were
NO plane crashes on 9/11.
The entire War On Terror is BOGUS. 
Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Judy Wood/John Hutchison) 
Linear Mode
