Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > General Off-topic > Lifestyle and Love
Lifestyle and Love Discuss health & fitness, dating, relationships, sex, and other kinds of topics related to lifestyle.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 02:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Super Sage
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts

Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed
Level up: 81% Level up: 81% Level up: 81%
Activity: 30%
Activity: 30% Activity: 30% Activity: 30%

Why Do Beautiful Women Sometimes Marry Unattractive Men?

The following is an article from 2006. I just now read it and found it amusing.

I will also supply the link which gives way to 70 comments by readers.

OhDear

Quote:
August 2, 2006, 9:44 am Why Do Beautiful Women Sometimes Marry Unattractive Men?

By Stephen J. Dubner
It may be that the unattractive man has a lot of money, or some other compelling attribute.
But a new study by Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics, suggests it may be a simple supply-and-demand issue: there are more beautiful women in the world than there are handsome men.
Why? Kanazawa argues it’s because good-looking parents are 36% more likely to have a baby daughter as their first child than a baby son — which suggests, evolutionarily speaking, that beauty is a trait more valuable for women than for men. The study was conducted with data from 3,000 Americans, derived from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, and was published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology.
According to this news article, “Selection pressure means when parents have traits they can pass on that are better for boys than for girls, they are more likely to have boys. Such traits include large size, strength and aggression, which might help a man compete for mates. On the other hand, parents with heritable traits that are more advantageous to girls are more likely to have daughters.”
Beauty is apparently just one “female” trait. Kanazawa has done previous research suggesting that nurses, social workers and kindergarten teachers — those with “empathic” traits — also had more daughters than sons. Meanwhile, he found that scientists, mathematicians and engineers are more likely to have sons than daughters.
It is good that Kanazawa is only a researcher and not, say, the president of Harvard. If he were, that last finding about scientists may have gotten him fired.
(Hat tip: Nadine Groney)




LINK

__________________

OhDear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
 
fxashun's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,480
Thanks: 113
Thanked 166 Times in 144 Posts

Points: 20,343, Level: 89
Points: 20,343, Level: 89 Points: 20,343, Level: 89 Points: 20,343, Level: 89
Level up: 90%, 7 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

I'll ask my wife.
__________________
fxashun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,219
Thanks: 226
Thanked 243 Times in 134 Posts

Points: 5,255, Level: 46
Points: 5,255, Level: 46 Points: 5,255, Level: 46 Points: 5,255, Level: 46
Level up: 47%, 95 Points needed
Level up: 47% Level up: 47% Level up: 47%
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%

So that we get more 'mirror' time.
__________________
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.
Catus Felidae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Sage
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts

Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed
Level up: 81% Level up: 81% Level up: 81%
Activity: 30%
Activity: 30% Activity: 30% Activity: 30%

If I understood the article correctly, there is a perceived evolutionary process noted that the more physically attractive couples have daughters first.

Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.

I am still me, whatever that means...but I can't say that one or the other of those men was better looking than the other.

OhDear
__________________

OhDear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,281
Thanks: 92
Thanked 176 Times in 150 Posts

Points: 24,747, Level: 95
Points: 24,747, Level: 95 Points: 24,747, Level: 95 Points: 24,747, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 603 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear View Post

Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.


OhDear
What about the third fourth and fifth husbands?
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,281
Thanks: 92
Thanked 176 Times in 150 Posts

Points: 24,747, Level: 95
Points: 24,747, Level: 95 Points: 24,747, Level: 95 Points: 24,747, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 603 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
I'll ask my wife.
5 points!
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Super Sage
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts

Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed
Level up: 81% Level up: 81% Level up: 81%
Activity: 30%
Activity: 30% Activity: 30% Activity: 30%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
What about the third fourth and fifth husbands?
Fifth??? Why you surely have your numbers all wrong.

OhDear
__________________

OhDear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
 
fxashun's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,480
Thanks: 113
Thanked 166 Times in 144 Posts

Points: 20,343, Level: 89
Points: 20,343, Level: 89 Points: 20,343, Level: 89 Points: 20,343, Level: 89
Level up: 90%, 7 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear View Post
If I understood the article correctly, there is a perceived evolutionary process noted that the more physically attractive couples have daughters first.

Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.

I am still me, whatever that means...but I can't say that one or the other of those men was better looking than the other.

OhDear
For what it's worth there OD, I'd play the beast to your beauty any day...


Well if you were like about 20 years younger and a few other stipulations. But from just looks tho, you'd definitely be the beauty I'd be seekin'.

I'm not known for my compliments as you can see.
__________________
fxashun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Sage
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts

Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80 Points: 15,649, Level: 80
Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed
Level up: 81% Level up: 81% Level up: 81%
Activity: 30%
Activity: 30% Activity: 30% Activity: 30%

Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
For what it's worth there OD, I'd play the beast to your beauty any day...


Well if you were like about 20 years younger and a few other stipulations. But from just looks tho, you'd definitely be the beauty I'd be seekin'.

I'm not known for my compliments as you can see.
Thank you Fx. I am all done with coupling myself to anyone ever again.

If I wasn't, a man with your integrity would be a plus. But like you wanting someone your own age, I am that way too...

OhDear
__________________

OhDear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
CrazyFlamingos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Alabama
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,114
Thanks: 1,024
Thanked 306 Times in 160 Posts

Points: 7,659, Level: 58
Points: 7,659, Level: 58 Points: 7,659, Level: 58 Points: 7,659, Level: 58
Level up: 59%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 59% Level up: 59% Level up: 59%
Activity: 19%
Activity: 19% Activity: 19% Activity: 19%

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear View Post
The following is an article from 2006. I just now read it and found it amusing.

I will also supply the link which gives way to 70 comments by readers.

OhDear


Amused is a good word for my reaction too. That and thought provoking.

I know a lot of couples who fit the profile. And one comes to mind that is the exact opposite.

She has a face that only a mother could love. And he is so handsome as to be almost pretty. Kind of a blond Pierce Brosnan. But they are both super nice people. And it seems to have worked for them for the last 30 years.
__________________
unfknblvbl


"I will hold up America to the lightning scorn of moral indignation. In doing this I shall feel myself discharging the duty of a true patriot; for he is a lover of his country who rebukes and does not excuse its sins." -- Frederick Douglass
CrazyFlamingos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites