| Lifestyle and Love Discuss health & fitness, dating, relationships, sex, and other kinds of topics related to lifestyle. |
01-31-2008, 02:09 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Super Sage
Country: Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender:
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 | Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed | | Why Do Beautiful Women Sometimes Marry Unattractive Men? The following is an article from 2006. I just now read it and found it amusing.
I will also supply the link which gives way to 70 comments by readers.
OhDear Quote:
August 2, 2006, 9:44 am Why Do Beautiful Women Sometimes Marry Unattractive Men?
By Stephen J. Dubner
It may be that the unattractive man has a lot of money, or some other compelling attribute.
But a new study by Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics, suggests it may be a simple supply-and-demand issue: there are more beautiful women in the world than there are handsome men.
Why? Kanazawa argues it’s because good-looking parents are 36% more likely to have a baby daughter as their first child than a baby son — which suggests, evolutionarily speaking, that beauty is a trait more valuable for women than for men. The study was conducted with data from 3,000 Americans, derived from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, and was published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology.
According to this news article, “Selection pressure means when parents have traits they can pass on that are better for boys than for girls, they are more likely to have boys. Such traits include large size, strength and aggression, which might help a man compete for mates. On the other hand, parents with heritable traits that are more advantageous to girls are more likely to have daughters.”
Beauty is apparently just one “female” trait. Kanazawa has done previous research suggesting that nurses, social workers and kindergarten teachers — those with “empathic” traits — also had more daughters than sons. Meanwhile, he found that scientists, mathematicians and engineers are more likely to have sons than daughters.
It is good that Kanazawa is only a researcher and not, say, the president of Harvard. If he were, that last finding about scientists may have gotten him fired.
(Hat tip: Nadine Groney) LINK |
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 03:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | SIMPLETON
Country: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In my skin
Gender:
Posts: 7,480
Thanks: 113
Thanked 166 Times in 144 Posts
Points: 20,343, Level: 89 | Level up: 90%, 7 Points needed | | I'll ask my wife.
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Council Member
Country: Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender:
Posts: 1,219
Thanks: 226
Thanked 243 Times in 134 Posts
Level up: 47%, 95 Points needed | | So that we get more 'mirror' time.
__________________ Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard. |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Super Sage
Country: Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender:
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 | Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed | | If I understood the article correctly, there is a perceived evolutionary process noted that the more physically attractive couples have daughters first.
Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.
I am still me, whatever that means...but I can't say that one or the other of those men was better looking than the other.
OhDear
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:19 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Partisan
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Gender:
Posts: 8,281
Thanks: 92
Thanked 176 Times in 150 Posts
Points: 24,747, Level: 95 | Level up: 96%, 603 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear
Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.
OhDear | What about the third fourth and fifth husbands?
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:19 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Partisan
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Gender:
Posts: 8,281
Thanks: 92
Thanked 176 Times in 150 Posts
Points: 24,747, Level: 95 | Level up: 96%, 603 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun I'll ask my wife. | 5 points!
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Super Sage
Country: Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender:
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 | Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher What about the third fourth and fifth husbands? | Fifth??? Why you surely have your numbers all wrong.
OhDear
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:22 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | SIMPLETON
Country: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In my skin
Gender:
Posts: 7,480
Thanks: 113
Thanked 166 Times in 144 Posts
Points: 20,343, Level: 89 | Level up: 90%, 7 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear If I understood the article correctly, there is a perceived evolutionary process noted that the more physically attractive couples have daughters first.
Well my first husband and I had two sons first and then my second one, we had a daughter first.
I am still me, whatever that means...but I can't say that one or the other of those men was better looking than the other.
OhDear | For what it's worth there OD, I'd play the beast to your beauty any day...
Well if you were like about 20 years younger and a few other stipulations. But from just looks tho, you'd definitely be the beauty I'd be seekin'.
I'm not known for my compliments as you can see.
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Super Sage
Country: Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender:
Posts: 4,059
Thanks: 124
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
Points: 15,649, Level: 80 | Level up: 81%, 201 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun For what it's worth there OD, I'd play the beast to your beauty any day...
Well if you were like about 20 years younger and a few other stipulations. But from just looks tho, you'd definitely be the beauty I'd be seekin'.
I'm not known for my compliments as you can see. | Thank you Fx. I am all done with coupling myself to anyone ever again.
If I wasn't, a man with your integrity would be a plus. But like you wanting someone your own age, I am that way too...
OhDear
__________________ |
| |
01-31-2008, 04:43 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Alabama
Gender:
Posts: 2,114
Thanks: 1,024
Thanked 306 Times in 160 Posts
Level up: 59%, 91 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear The following is an article from 2006. I just now read it and found it amusing.
I will also supply the link which gives way to 70 comments by readers.
OhDear |
Amused is a good word for my reaction too. That and thought provoking.
I know a lot of couples who fit the profile. And one comes to mind that is the exact opposite.
She has a face that only a mother could love. And he is so handsome as to be almost pretty. Kind of a blond Pierce Brosnan. But they are both super nice people. And it seems to have worked for them for the last 30 years.
__________________ unfknblvbl "I will hold up America to the lightning scorn of moral indignation. In doing this I shall feel myself discharging the duty of a true patriot; for he is a lover of his country who rebukes and does not excuse its sins." -- Frederick Douglass |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |