Hucks thoughts on the subject.

fxashun · 02-25-2008, 05:48 PM

Houstonvoice.com
Mike Huckabee on Tyra Banks

Gay rights will be discussed in Tyra Banks' interview with Mike Huckabee on her show on Friday, Feb. 29. The transcript follows:

TYRA BANKS: I know that you are a preacher; do you believe that homosexuality is immoral?

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: Well, I think a lot of things in our lives are missing the mark. The word sin means missing the mark. It doesn't mean that a person has committed murder. I miss the mark if I don't tell the whole truth. I miss the mark in a lot of ways. I think that we were created to have relationships with someone of the opposite gender, that how's we reproduce, that's how we live our lives. So I think sometimes if you say is it a sin or immoral and people think you're making these terrible statements about somebody. I've had people who are gay that worked on my staff. It's not like I'm some homophobe. If you ask me is it the normal pathway? I don't think so. But, you know, I respect that people have different views about that.

TYRA BANKS: Do you want the gay vote?

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: Sure, I want every vote. Seriously, I want to be president of everybody. And I can disagree with people over a choice they make in their life or a over a lifestyle, and still be their president and still say I want to keep you free, I want to keep your country safe, I want to make your taxes lower not higher. I want to solve some issues like the problems we have in education, and rebuild our health care system and I think whether a person is straight or gay, they want a president who is solving issues, not just pointing out differences among people.

TYRA BANKS: What if they say, I want to vote for you Governor Huckabee, but I'm a gay man and I want to marry my man. What do you say to that?

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: To change the definitions of institutions like marriage is beyond saying, if people want to live a life that's different than others, that's fine but when you redefine basic institutions of marriage, government, whatever they may be that's when we really should have a pretty thorough public discussion about it.

TYRA BANKS: You're open to a public discussion at least?

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: I think we're having that. Whether or not we should change the rules and marriage and redefine it someway, I'm not comfortable with that.

TYRA BANKS: Comfortable or opposed?

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: Opposed. I think it's something that is not a good thing. I go back to the point the a marriage ought to be, the context in which two people not only have, they may not have children but have the capacity and ultimately to train replacements and create the kind of environment in which people are able to thrive.

TYRA BANKS: I'm asking you some many questions about this because I love the gays and the gays love me. And I know I cannot walk down the street here in New York City if I didn't press that issue and truly ask you that.

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE: I think you should. I think people will respect my views on that, I respect theirs. The great thing about America is we can have totally different viewpoints and we can do it without having animosity, and hatred. This is one of the great countries where you can have sharp disagreements without killing each other over it. That's where I think we need to celebrate what is great about America and that is we all don't have to agree.

chandon12 · 02-25-2008, 05:52 PM

If he thinks he's courting for the GLBT vote with that, then he aint gonna get any.

He did seem to soften his stance, not by much mind you.

garysher · 02-25-2008, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chandon12

If he thinks he's courting for the GLBT vote with that, then he aint gonna get any.

He did seem to soften his stance, not by much mind you.

None of the candidates supported homosexual marriage, with the possible exception of Kucinich and presumably Nader (if you can call them candidates).

So who will the homosexuals vote for?

chandon12 · 02-25-2008, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

None of the candidates supported homosexual marriage, with the possible exception of Kucinich and presumably Nader (if you can call them candidates).

So who will the homosexuals vote for?

I'll update you after tomorrow night. We've been invited to a limited audience Town Hall meeting with ole Hillary and Barak prior to the debate. Its hosted by the Stonewall Democrats and I plan on asking them about this very issue.

garysher · 02-25-2008, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chandon12

I'll update you after tomorrow night. We've been invited to a limited audience Town Hall meeting with ole Hillary and Barak prior to the debate. Its hosted by the Stonewall Democrats and I plan on asking them about this very issue.

Be sure to wear your best pink feather boa in case the cameras are there

tristanrobin · 02-25-2008, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chandon12

If he thinks he's courting for the GLBT vote with that, then he aint gonna get any.

He did seem to soften his stance, not by much mind you.

He wants to protect EVERYBODY? However, he doesn't believe that gays are worthy of equal protections under the law for their families.

Screw 'em. He didn't soften his stance - he just didn't hide his anti-gay stance behind a bunch of Biblical rhetoric like he does with his right wing Christo-Het Supremacists followers.

He also said that he thought that the COnstitution should be revised to better reflect God's word. If he got elected, I don't know how the hell he could swear to uphold a constitution which he doesn't think is a good one.

garysher · 02-25-2008, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tristanrobin

He wants to protect EVERYBODY? However, he doesn't believe that gays are worthy of equal protections under the law for their families.

Homosexuals already have equal protections - more protections in many cases.

Why do you still try to perpetuate this tattered lie?

Screw 'em. He didn't soften his stance - he just didn't hide his anti-gay stance behind a bunch of Biblical rhetoric like he does with his right wing Christo-Het Supremacists followers.

You mean Huck isn't prepared to lie about the Bible's clear teaching on homosexuality just to cozy up to homosexual voters?

He also said that he thought that the COnstitution should be revised to better reflect God's word. If he got elected, I don't know how the hell he could swear to uphold a constitution which he doesn't think is a good one.

Huck has said he's in favour of the Marriage Amendment to protect traditional marriage constitutionally.

I think McCain supports it too.

tristanrobin · 02-25-2008, 08:58 PM

"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards," Huckabee said, referring to the need for a constitutional human life amendment and an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

In other words, the Constitution is not something he feels he should defend - he believes he should change it.

garysher · 02-26-2008, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tristanrobin

"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards," Huckabee said, referring to the need for a constitutional human life amendment and an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

In other words, the Constitution is not something he feels he should defend - he believes he should change it.

Huck believes, as do hundreds of millions of Americans, that the Constitution should be amended in order to defend it.

Does anyone really believe that the Founding Fathers wanted to redefine marriage for homosexuals?

tristanrobin · 02-26-2008, 07:52 AM

Quote:

that the Constitution should be amended in order to defend it

ROFLMAO

So, in order to defend marriage, we should amend the restrictions?

"I want to defend this by changing it to something else!!!" LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL