Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2008, 11:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,688
Points: 26,276, Level: 96
Points: 26,276, Level: 96 Points: 26,276, Level: 96 Points: 26,276, Level: 96
Level up: 93%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 93% Level up: 93% Level up: 93%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
Clinton/Obama - the Dream Ticket emerges
There's only one right answer - a Clinton/Obama ticket

Otherwise whoever gets the nomination will be pissing off the other 50% of the Democratic party and that's not good.

The two aren't that far apart on issues. But there's no sense on battering themselves for the next 6 months whilst teh Republicans stand around clapping!

Also it lines up Obama for 4 or 8 years of experience before running for President.

It could lead to a 16 year run for Democrats.



Sponsored Links
Old 03-05-2008, 02:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,530
Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Level up: 78%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 22%
Activity: 22% Activity: 22% Activity: 22%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
A Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket wouldn't make much sense, and most people on both sides of this competition actually wouldn't like to see such a ticket according to polls. I don't think either one of them are interested in becoming the Vice President.

We've seen long primary competitions before, and people haven't had that hard of a time rallying behind the winning candidate.

We're much more likely to see a rather unknown running mate (I believe the Governor of my home state of Ohio, Ted Strickland has been rumored as a possible running mate for Clinton, though I personally seriously doubt it), or perhaps a ticket with Edwards on it.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 03-05-2008, 02:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
highway80west's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,335
Points: 14,915, Level: 79
Points: 14,915, Level: 79 Points: 14,915, Level: 79 Points: 14,915, Level: 79
Level up: 13%, 435 Points needed
Level up: 13% Level up: 13% Level up: 13%
Activity: 60%
Activity: 60% Activity: 60% Activity: 60%
highway80west is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
A Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket wouldn't make much sense, and most people on both sides of this competition actually wouldn't like to see such a ticket according to polls. I don't think either one of them are interested in becoming the Vice President.

We've seen long primary competitions before, and people haven't had that hard of a time rallying behind the winning candidate.

We're much more likely to see a rather unknown running mate (I believe the Governor of my home state of Ohio, Ted Strickland has been rumored as a possible running mate for Clinton, though I personally seriously doubt it), or perhaps a ticket with Edwards on it.
When Kennedy was the nominee, Johnson didn't seem too interested as the VP nominee. He wanted to become president during the 1960 elections. Never mind what happened following the tragic death of JFK in 1963. Johnson sort of got his wish.
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105
Old 03-05-2008, 02:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,530
Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Level up: 78%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 22%
Activity: 22% Activity: 22% Activity: 22%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highway80west View Post
When Kennedy was the nominee, Johnson didn't seem too interested as the VP nominee. He wanted to become president during the 1960 elections. Never mind what happened following the tragic death of JFK in 1963. Johnson sort of got his wish.
The "Hillary factor" will play in whether she's the Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate. Many conservatives would like to stay home and not vote for McCain unless they can do so against Hillary. I personally believe an Obama-Edwards ticket is a slam dunk.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 03-05-2008, 02:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,688
Points: 26,276, Level: 96
Points: 26,276, Level: 96 Points: 26,276, Level: 96 Points: 26,276, Level: 96
Level up: 93%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 93% Level up: 93% Level up: 93%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
The "Hillary factor" will play in whether she's the Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate. Many conservatives would like to stay home and not vote for McCain unless they can do so against Hillary. I personally believe an Obama-Edwards ticket is a slam dunk.

I disagree with the notion that conservatives will only vote for McCain to stop Hillary.

When they chips are down they will have to stop whining and vote for McCain no matter who wins the dem nomination.

Letting Clinton and Obama battle it out for the next 6 months, with an end result that 50% of Dems didn't choose, achieves nothing.

Edwards is history.

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites