 As if telling superdelegates to ignore the popular vote wasn't enough, now she's telling pledged delegates that are directly tied to the elections to do the same. It is interesting for her to continue to peddle this while at the same time accuse the Obama camp as the ones being 'anti-democratic' for opposing reelections in Florida and Michigan.
They're called pledged delegates for a reason. Perhaps Clinton is more afraid than anything that democracy is working. If I'm not mistaken, Obama has repeatedly come out in favor of reelections in Michigan and Florida so long as the Clintons agreed that those who voted Republican or Independent in the first run would be allowed to vote on the Democratic ballot the second time around. With the knowledge that Rush Limbaugh is telling Republican voters to vote for Hillary Clinton only to further divide the Democrats and because Hillary would be easier defeated in the general election, I don't know what she has to worry about.
So who's really being anti-democratic in this picture?? "If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72 | 
03-26-2008, 01:30 PM
Linear Mode
