Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Other Topics of Discussion > Philosophy
Philosophy Discuss and debate the philosophies of religion, issues of faith, free will and determinism, and theories of knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2008, 04:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

Points: 1,606, Level: 23
Points: 1,606, Level: 23 Points: 1,606, Level: 23 Points: 1,606, Level: 23
Level up: 24%, 94 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%

Brain: Constructs rather than mirrors reality

Brain: Constructs rather than mirrors reality

Thomas Kuhn, in his famous book, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, explains the difficult we have with recognizing and accepting experiences that contradict our anticipations.

Kuhn details some of the problems that arose while scientists discovered such scientific anomalies as X-ray and oxygen.

As Kuhn observed:
“Novelty emerges with difficulty, manifested by resistance, against a back drop provided by expectation. Initially, only the anticipated and usual are experienced even under circumstances where anomaly is later to be discovered…Further acquaintance, however, does result of awareness of something wrong…[which] opens a period in which perceptual categories are adjusted until the initially anomalous has become the anticipated.”

He concludes: “What a man sees depends upon what he looks at and also upon what his previous visual-conceptual experience has taught him to see.”

Kuhn provides us with an experiment performed by Jerome Bruner and Leo Postman undertaken to illuminate this human characteristic of seeing only what we are prepared to see.

Subjects were shown standard playing cards mixed with the anomalous card a red six of spades and a black four of hearts. Subjects repeatedly and erroneously identified the anomalous cards as a six of hearts or a four of spades. Some, even after the experiment was over, displayed confusion and even anger at the experiment. Only after repeated exposures to the cards did the subjects slowly feel something was askew here. Only after forty exposures did the subjects correctly identify the cards.


coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 10:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,496
Thanks: 97
Thanked 221 Times in 120 Posts

Points: 12,295, Level: 72
Points: 12,295, Level: 72 Points: 12,295, Level: 72 Points: 12,295, Level: 72
Level up: 73%, 155 Points needed
Level up: 73% Level up: 73% Level up: 73%
Activity: 18%
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%

Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
What a man sees is what it is absolutely, for it reveals itself as it is. The brain is a sensory organ that directly perceives reality of which is absolutely indicative of itself insofar of the ranges of perceptibility (e.g. I cannot directly sense radio waves). The only thing being constantly created is our interpretations of reality (i.e. subjective experiences). The subjects in the experiment observed reality absolutely but wrongly interpreted the data because the data was intentionally deceptive.
__________________
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Katczinsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 07:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

Points: 1,606, Level: 23
Points: 1,606, Level: 23 Points: 1,606, Level: 23 Points: 1,606, Level: 23
Level up: 24%, 94 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%

There is indeed some sensory input that stimulates the reality we create. It is a difficult thing to discuss because we do not have a vocabulary suitable for discussing it. Kant speaks of the thing-in-itself as being that reality out there and we speak of the reality that we know. Our problem lies in that we use the same word "reality" for both because up until recently everyone considered what we know is what is out there.
coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites