Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Branches of Government

Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2006, 12:07 AM   #1 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,367
Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Level up: 1%, 993 Points needed
Level up: 1% Level up: 1% Level up: 1%
Activity: 57%
Activity: 57% Activity: 57% Activity: 57%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
Rove vs. Reality
It was in the middle of a question-and-answer session yesterday after a speech defending President Bush's economic record that Karl Rove let drop a phrase that told us everything.

Speaking at the American Enterprise Institute, Rove started talking about "game changers," a nice, wonky term to throw around at a leading conservative think tank. The idea is that certain changes in policy can push the political debate in new and -- from the point of view of the game changer -- more congenial directions. The phrase told us everything about what Bush's No. 1 guy had once hoped to accomplish -- and everything about the fix he and the president are now in.

Rove's hope was that at the end of the Bush presidency, he and his boss would have so changed the rules of the policy and political game that all the pressures would be for lower taxes, less domestic spending, more market-friendly approaches to health care, and private accounts within Social Security.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051501201.html

---------------------
As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing” ---Karl Rove
Sponsored Links
Old 05-16-2006, 12:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by intangible child
It was in the middle of a question-and-answer session yesterday after a speech defending President Bush's economic record that Karl Rove let drop a phrase that told us everything.

Speaking at the American Enterprise Institute, Rove started talking about "game changers," a nice, wonky term to throw around at a leading conservative think tank. The idea is that certain changes in policy can push the political debate in new and -- from the point of view of the game changer -- more congenial directions. The phrase told us everything about what Bush's No. 1 guy had once hoped to accomplish -- and everything about the fix he and the president are now in.

Rove's hope was that at the end of the Bush presidency, he and his boss would have so changed the rules of the policy and political game that all the pressures would be for lower taxes, less domestic spending, more market-friendly approaches to health care, and private accounts within Social Security.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051501201.html

---------------------
As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing” ---Karl Rove
Do you think that Bush and his right-hand man are the only President/advisor pair that sets out to "change things"?

Surely you jest!

"Change" is the catch-word of EVERY election!
Old 05-16-2006, 12:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Carl Rove drives the democrats crazy. They try and try and keep telling us an indictment is coming. They remind me of clouds with no rain. It really is pathetic. It really makes them look like fools to focus on one man so much. He really got to them.
Old 05-16-2006, 03:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Carl Rove drives the democrats crazy. They try and try and keep telling us an indictment is coming. They remind me of clouds with no rain. It really is pathetic. It really makes them look like fools to focus on one man so much. He really got to them.
Kinda like they keep saying - over and over and over - that Bush is going to be impeached.
Old 05-16-2006, 03:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,680
Country:
Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Level up: 91%, 36 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Kinda like they keep saying - over and over and over - that Bush is going to be impeached.
Hmmm, if "they" means just a few. Most Democrats are trying to avoid the whole impeachment word, and are really against its thought. Most avoid it and try to talk about other more mainstream issues like immigration and such. Although there isn't a guarantee that they wont push for it more if they gain more seats this year, it definetly currently isn't a popular topic among Democrats. I personally am skeptical of the Democrat's promises, just as I am of Republicans. It seems as if the mainstream parties are so bad now adays. We need more third party candidates and independents. I have a feeling a lot of Americans are fustrated with the continued unfulfilled promises of both the Democrats and Republicans, and I have a feeling that the third parties are going to get their most popular year in 2008. Although I guess it could just be wishful thinking.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 05-17-2006, 09:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
Hmmm, if "they" means just a few. Most Democrats are trying to avoid the whole impeachment word, and are really against its thought. Most avoid it and try to talk about other more mainstream issues like immigration and such. Although there isn't a guarantee that they wont push for it more if they gain more seats this year, it definetly currently isn't a popular topic among Democrats. I personally am skeptical of the Democrat's promises, just as I am of Republicans. It seems as if the mainstream parties are so bad now adays. We need more third party candidates and independents. I have a feeling a lot of Americans are fustrated with the continued unfulfilled promises of both the Democrats and Republicans, and I have a feeling that the third parties are going to get their most popular year in 2008. Although I guess it could just be wishful thinking.
The ONLY reason Democrats have quited down recently about impeachment is THEY HAVE NO LEGAL GROUNDS. At least SOME of them are smart enough to admit it. Too bad so many of you are NOT.
Old 05-17-2006, 09:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,367
Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Level up: 1%, 993 Points needed
Level up: 1% Level up: 1% Level up: 1%
Activity: 57%
Activity: 57% Activity: 57% Activity: 57%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
The ONLY reason Democrats have quited down recently about impeachment is THEY HAVE NO LEGAL GROUNDS. At least SOME of them are smart enough to admit it. Too bad so many of you are NOT.
As an Independent, I know for fact that there are grounds!

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.

6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.

Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.

9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."

10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.

11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.

12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.

13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.

14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.

15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.

16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."

17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.

1 Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.

19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.

20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.
http://www.impeachbush.org/site/News...s_iv_ctrl=1061

http://www.impeachbush.org/site/PageServer
Old 05-17-2006, 09:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by intangible child
As an Independent, I know for fact that there are grounds!
First of all, you're an Independent in your "air claim" only.

And unless you're a constitutional lawyer - which you clearly are NOT - you CANNOT "KNOW FOR A FACT" that there are grounds to impeach Bush.


And your website you posted, which is little more than a sub-forum of MoveOn.org., proves NOTHING.
Old 05-17-2006, 10:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,367
Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92 Points: 21,357, Level: 92
Level up: 1%, 993 Points needed
Level up: 1% Level up: 1% Level up: 1%
Activity: 57%
Activity: 57% Activity: 57% Activity: 57%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
 
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." ~ Dick Cheney, August 26 2002

"We know for a fact that there are weapons there." ~ Ari Fleischer, January 9 2003


"We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad."
~ Donald Rumsfeld, March 30 2003


"The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office I must inform the Citizen of his plight." ~ President John F. Kennedy -Assassinated 10 days later!
Old 05-17-2006, 10:56 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Blah blah blah...

What does any of your GIANT POST have to do with impeachable offenses?

The answer? NOTHING - or Bush would already have been impeached.


Duhhhh...
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites