In all my time on this site i have never seen a definition of terrorist. So here i will bring up my own.

A terrorist is a person who will use violence to induce fear (terror) on the population in order to promote his/her.

So far i never seen anybody say that arabs are terrorists ( except bigots ). Never heard a bigot call a muslim a terrorist. Never heard a bigot call a bearded pedrson a terrorist. Why is that?

Well because terrorism exists everywhere. the IRA, the Basques, Timothy Mcveigh, Al Qaeda, Maoist rebels in Nepal, Tamils tigers in Sri Lanka and Aum Shinriyko in Japan.

Terrorism is a political tool that has been used by a variety of different, political, ethnic, religious and ideological groups. It exists independently as a tool and a political phenomena. IT HAS NO AFFILIATION.

How did it come about? It is a tool that was developed by small groups that had very little or no military strength. It was the only alternative to a conventional military force. Let's face it, the IRA could never have faced the british forces in direct warfare.

So what complaints do we have about terrorism? Well first off it kills innocent people. So does conventional warfare. The americans have killed more innocent civilians in the Iraq war than all terrorist actions in the history of mankind. ( but then again all arabs and muslims are guilty terrorists by default .. right alias?.. so those aren't innocents killed byt the coalition forces.. cuz of course the coalition forces are pure angels no?)

Terrorism induces fear in the population. I don't know guys, but last i checked, a conventional war creates more panic.

Terrorism ruin local infrastructure. Again conventional war fucks it completely.

Terrorism is just another type of war. WAR is bad. ANY type of action that claims the lives of innocents, leaves people hungry and homeless, and destroys local infrastructure is wrong.

Labelling terrorism as wrong while all out war is labelled as OK is just plain ridiculous. As if certain TYPES of war are ok.

But it's a very convenient description though. See by this definition, the americans don't have to be responsible for human deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. Because their soldiers who kill innocents are "heroes" while an arab shooting americans invading his home is a "terrorist".

As far as the rest of the world is concerned, the americans are the biggest terrorists of all. Now i happen to know that statement is as untrue about all americans as it is about all arabs or all muslims.

But obviously as far as you go alias, it's only untrue about americans right? Because god spoke to Bush and told him right?

Terrorism and war are the same. Neither are cultural aspects of any religious, ethnic, national or political group. And BOTH can be stopped. But not if both sides keep thinking that killing is the only solution.

Support VIOLENCE and you remain a rung below on the evolutionary ladder. And that goes for ALL HUMANS.