| Budget and Taxes Do you feel that raising taxes will help solve the debt of the United States? Are you a fan of Reaganomics? | |
View Poll Results: Support private accounts? | |
Yes
|    | 7 | 63.64% | |
No
|    | 3 | 27.27% | |
Undecided
|    | 1 | 9.09% |
01-17-2005, 12:16 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Website Owner
Country: Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Taxachusetts
Gender:
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Support private accounts? Private accounts? |
| |
05-06-2005, 09:37 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,455
Thanks: 299
Thanked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Points: 49,920, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | I think it should be optional. It should be something a person can opt into. Like the Government Employee's Thrift Savings Plan. |
| |
05-06-2005, 08:35 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | The Man You Love to Hate
Country: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender:
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed | | Truthfully, I believe that if you cannot offer it as an option to the entire country, they need to scrap the thrift plan and the plan that Congress itself uses, and force them to follow the same plan as the rest of the country. I wonder then how many of them would still be up on their soap box defending a system that is racist, sexist and corrupt.
dmk
__________________ Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles -Russell Kirk- |
| |
05-07-2005, 01:32 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,455
Thanks: 299
Thanked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Points: 49,920, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by sgtdmski Truthfully, I believe that if you cannot offer it as an option to the entire country, they need to scrap the thrift plan and the plan that Congress itself uses, and force them to follow the same plan as the rest of the country. I wonder then how many of them would still be up on their soap box defending a system that is racist, sexist and corrupt.
dmk | I am curious, what do you have against the Thrift Savings Plan? I know a lot of guys who invest in it and like it. |
| |
05-07-2005, 03:10 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | The Man You Love to Hate
Country: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender:
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed | | I have nothing against it at all, except the fact that the government is allowed to exempt itself from laws. Privatization of Social Security will allow those of us young enough to invest our money. The rate of return on SS is ridiculous. I could earn more money by just placing my money in a bank account earning a measly 3% than I would get from SS. I just threw that out there because the opponents of private SS have their own versions.
dmk
__________________ Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles -Russell Kirk- |
| |
05-07-2005, 03:13 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | The Man You Love to Hate
Country: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender:
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed | | I have nothing against the thrisft saving plan, except the fact that the government exempts itself from the laws it doesn't like, while forcing them on the rest of us. If you will not allow those of us willing to invest our SS, then you should not offer private plans to your employees. Let the opponents of private acounts feel what its like to no longer have any.
dmk
__________________ Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles -Russell Kirk- |
| |
05-07-2005, 04:13 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,455
Thanks: 299
Thanked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Points: 49,920, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by sgtdmski I have nothing against it at all, except the fact that the government is allowed to exempt itself from laws. Privatization of Social Security will allow those of us young enough to invest our money. The rate of return on SS is ridiculous. I could earn more money by just placing my money in a bank account earning a measly 3% than I would get from SS. I just threw that out there because the opponents of private SS have their own versions.
dmk | I agree that the ROI on SS is ridiculously low, and it is the only legal Pyramid scheme. What laws is TSP exemted from? I really don't know. |
| |
05-07-2005, 05:03 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Website Owner
Country: Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Taxachusetts
Gender:
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by sgtdmski I could earn more money by just placing my money in a bank account earning a measly 3% than I would get from SS.
dmk | Wow I never really looked at it that way. That is a great argument I can use against someone who is against private accounts. Thanks!  |
| |
05-11-2005, 06:37 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 29%, 119 Points needed | | - The best course of action with respect to Social Security is to sunset the program, grandfathering (on a pro-rated basis) those who have contributed. There is no justification for the federal government involving itself in my financial affairs.
__________________ \"The gravest abuse of power--and the greatest threat to individual liberty--occurs when the individuals to whom we look for the preservation of law and order turn out to be the predators.\" |
| |
05-11-2005, 08:42 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender:
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds Quote: |
Originally Posted by sgtdmski I could earn more money by just placing my money in a bank account earning a measly 3% than I would get from SS.
dmk | Wow I never really looked at it that way. That is a great argument I can use against someone who is against private accounts. Thanks!  | Wait a minute. Terrible logic and terrible stat because it leaves out the very important fact of how much money you have to have in your account at 3% to make it work. Probably a hell of a lot more than most Americans??? |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |