| Drugs and Alcohol Debate and defend your political beliefs of whether or not some drugs should be illegal or legalized. | 
03-14-2007, 12:41 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Council Member
Country:  Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: 
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Level up: 48%, 184 Points needed | | Court rules against dying woman in medical marijuana case
Court rules against dying woman in medical marijuana case
By DAVID KRAVETS
03/14/07 10:18:08
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that a California woman whose doctor says marijuana is the only medicine keeping her alive is not immune from federal prosecution on drug charges.
The case was brought by Angel Raich, an Oakland mother of two who suffers from scoliosis, a brain tumor, chronic nausea and other ailments. On her doctor's advice, she eats or smokes marijuana every couple of hours to ease her pain and bolster a nonexistent appetite as conventional drugs did not work.
The Supreme Court ruled against Raich two years ago, saying that medical marijuana users and their suppliers could be prosecuted for breaching federal drug laws even if they lived in a state such as California where medical pot is legal.
Because of that ruling, the issue before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was narrowed to the so-called right to life theory: that the gravely ill have a right to marijuana to keep them alive when legal drugs fail.
Raich, 41, began sobbing when she was told of the decision and said she would continue using the drug.
"I'm sure not going to let them kill me," she said. "Oh my God."
When the case was argued before the appeals court a year ago, the government said it could not guarantee that Raich or other seriously ill patients using medical marijuana would not be prosecuted. Over the years, the government has raided dozens of medical marijuana dispensaries, mostly in California.
The case is likely to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, but each time the high court has taken up the issue of medical marijuana it has ruled against allowing the sick and dying to use the drug to ease their symptoms and possibly prolong life.
The latest legal wrangling once again highlighted the tension between the federal government, which declares marijuana an illegal controlled substance with no medical value, and the 11 states allowing medical marijuana for patients with a doctor's recommendation.
Voters in 1996 made California the first state to authorize patients to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation. At least 10 other states followed suit. The case is Raich v. Gonzales, 03-15481. FresnoBee.com: California: Court rules against dying woman in medical marijuana case | 
|  | |
03-14-2007, 12:45 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country:  Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,522
Thanks: 344
Thanked 374 Times in 220 Posts
Points: 50,721, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Simply ridiculous | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 12:46 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: RI
Gender:
Posts: 2,909
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Points: 14,720, Level: 78 | Level up: 79%, 130 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector  Court rules against dying woman in medical marijuana case
By DAVID KRAVETS
03/14/07 10:18:08
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that a California woman whose doctor says marijuana is the only medicine keeping her alive is not immune from federal prosecution on drug charges.
The case was brought by Angel Raich, an Oakland mother of two who suffers from scoliosis, a brain tumor, chronic nausea and other ailments. On her doctor's advice, she eats or smokes marijuana every couple of hours to ease her pain and bolster a nonexistent appetite as conventional drugs did not work.
The Supreme Court ruled against Raich two years ago, saying that medical marijuana users and their suppliers could be prosecuted for breaching federal drug laws even if they lived in a state such as California where medical pot is legal.
Because of that ruling, the issue before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was narrowed to the so-called right to life theory: that the gravely ill have a right to marijuana to keep them alive when legal drugs fail.
Raich, 41, began sobbing when she was told of the decision and said she would continue using the drug.
"I'm sure not going to let them kill me," she said. "Oh my God."
When the case was argued before the appeals court a year ago, the government said it could not guarantee that Raich or other seriously ill patients using medical marijuana would not be prosecuted. Over the years, the government has raided dozens of medical marijuana dispensaries, mostly in California.
The case is likely to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, but each time the high court has taken up the issue of medical marijuana it has ruled against allowing the sick and dying to use the drug to ease their symptoms and possibly prolong life.
The latest legal wrangling once again highlighted the tension between the federal government, which declares marijuana an illegal controlled substance with no medical value, and the 11 states allowing medical marijuana for patients with a doctor's recommendation.
Voters in 1996 made California the first state to authorize patients to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation. At least 10 other states followed suit. The case is Raich v. Gonzales, 03-15481. FresnoBee.com: California: Court rules against dying woman in medical marijuana case | This is really not that surprising. The Feds have always reserved the right to convict anyone using Medical Marijuana. It sucks, but that is the way it is set up.
__________________
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour
There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 12:49 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,522
Thanks: 344
Thanked 374 Times in 220 Posts
Points: 50,721, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | It's pretty fucked up if you ask me. | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 12:52 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Council Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: NY
Gender: 
Posts: 1,361
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 41%, 135 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay This is really not that surprising. The Feds have always reserved the right to convict anyone using Medical Marijuana. It sucks, but that is the way it is set up. | Agreed that it is set up that way, but it doesn't make it any less wrong IMO.
__________________  | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 12:55 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,522
Thanks: 344
Thanked 374 Times in 220 Posts
Points: 50,721, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightOfSappho Agreed that it is set up that way, but it doesn't make it any less wrong IMO. | Damn right. Government is supposed to serve the people. I think we have forgotten that. | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 01:00 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Council Member
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender:
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Level up: 48%, 184 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector "The latest legal wrangling once again highlighted the tension between the federal government, which declares marijuana an illegal controlled substance with no medical value..." | Even though the primary active ingredient (delta-9-THC) exists in both marijuana and the legally-prescribed and FDA-approved Marinol pill.
Fucking hypocrites! | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 01:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Head of Security
Country: Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender:
Posts: 11,522
Thanks: 344
Thanked 374 Times in 220 Posts
Points: 50,721, Level: 100 | Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector Even though the primary active ingredient (delta-9-THC) exists in both marijuana and the legally-prescribed and FDA-approved Marinol pill.
Fucking hypocrites! | Yeah... it stinks. This is why it's important to vote. | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 01:15 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Council Member
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender:
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Level up: 48%, 184 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256 Yeah... it stinks. This is why it's important to vote. | From a medical standpoint, this conclusion by the Federal Government that marijuana has no medical use is simply unacceptable in my opinion.
It just reeks of politics and has no objective basis.
I hope this case goes back up to the Supreme Court and that they take a real hard look at the current situation concerning the medicinal qualities of marijuana for once and for all. | |
| | |
03-14-2007, 01:37 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Alabama
Gender:
Posts: 2,122
Thanks: 1,052
Thanked 318 Times in 165 Posts
Level up: 60%, 182 Points needed | | This is insane. Doesn't the federal government have anything better to do? Quote: |
....the federal government, which declares marijuana an illegal controlled substance with no medical value, ........
| There is an incredible body of evidence that this is not the case. | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | |
