Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Militaries and War

Militaries and War Debate and discuss global militaries, past and present wars including the war on terror.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2005, 02:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Anyone with a brain knows Saddam was never a threat.
Do you have anything to back that up? A lot of people better and wiser than me (but maybe not you ) thought that he was a threat.
A threat to our econonic interests maybe. It is common knowledge that Iraq does not possess long range weapons capable of reaching North America.
That's true, and maybe I'm just being circumlocutory here, but Iraq did have missiles which could reach Israel, and start another Arab-Israeli war, thus further destabilizing the Middle East.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Sponsored Links
Old 09-19-2005, 03:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,887
Country:
Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Level up: 16%, 1,399 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Anyone with a brain knows Saddam was never a threat.
Do you have anything to back that up? A lot of people better and wiser than me (but maybe not you ) thought that he was a threat.
A threat to our econonic interests maybe. It is common knowledge that Iraq does not possess long range weapons capable of reaching North America.
That's true, and maybe I'm just being circumlocutory here, but Iraq did have missiles which could reach Israel, and start another Arab-Israeli war, thus further destabilizing the Middle East.

Sure, but we really shouldn't have anything to do with Israel either. We have enough to worry about here at home.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 09-19-2005, 10:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Anyone with a brain knows Saddam was never a threat.
Do you have anything to back that up? A lot of people better and wiser than me (but maybe not you ) thought that he was a threat.
A threat to our econonic interests maybe. It is common knowledge that Iraq does not possess long range weapons capable of reaching North America.
That's true, and maybe I'm just being circumlocutory here, but Iraq did have missiles which could reach Israel, and start another Arab-Israeli war, thus further destabilizing the Middle East.

Sure, but we really shouldn't have anything to do with Israel either. We have enough to worry about here at home.
So you think that we should just let the Arabs and Israelis fight? At what point is it our duty to step in? Only after it becomes genocide (Rwanda, Sudan)? I also have reservations about the U.S. being the world's policeman, so I'm interested in your opinions on this subject.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-19-2005, 11:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,887
Country:
Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Level up: 16%, 1,399 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Anyone with a brain knows Saddam was never a threat.
Do you have anything to back that up? A lot of people better and wiser than me (but maybe not you ) thought that he was a threat.
A threat to our econonic interests maybe. It is common knowledge that Iraq does not possess long range weapons capable of reaching North America.
That's true, and maybe I'm just being circumlocutory here, but Iraq did have missiles which could reach Israel, and start another Arab-Israeli war, thus further destabilizing the Middle East.

Sure, but we really shouldn't have anything to do with Israel either. We have enough to worry about here at home.
So you think that we should just let the Arabs and Israelis fight? At what point is it our duty to step in? Only after it becomes genocide (Rwanda, Sudan)? I also have reservations about the U.S. being the world's policeman, so I'm interested in your opinions on this subject.

I think we should try to help with any conflict using dimplomacy. Honestly I don't think there would be a conflict in Israel today if we had not supported them both financially and militarily. I don't think we should have put our nose in their business.

In cases of genocide I think we should be involved in a united front with our allies when needed. I think our reaction to problems in Africa have been terrible and I think it is because of two reasons. 1) no economic interests 2) race.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 09-19-2005, 11:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
So you think that we should just let the Arabs and Israelis fight? At what point is it our duty to step in? Only after it becomes genocide (Rwanda, Sudan)? I also have reservations about the U.S. being the world's policeman, so I'm interested in your opinions on this subject.

I think we should try to help with any conflict using dimplomacy. Honestly I don't think there would be a conflict in Israel today if we had not supported them both financially and militarily. I don't think we should have put our nose in their business.

In cases of genocide I think we should be involved in a united front with our allies when needed. I think our reaction to problems in Africa have been terrible and I think it is because of two reasons. 1) no economic interests 2) race.
You're right. If we didn't support Israel, they would all be dead. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, et. al. have basically said that they want another holocaust. I think that it would be immoral if we didn't support Israel.

I generally agree with your comments on genocide.

(if you think it's necessary, you can move these posts to a new thread, since I'm a little off topic.)
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-19-2005, 11:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,887
Country:
Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Level up: 16%, 1,399 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
You're right. If we didn't support Israel, they would all be dead. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, et. al. have basically said that they want another holocaust. I think that it would be immoral if we didn't support Israel.
Yes, that is what I was implying about Israel. I just don't see what business we have being there. It is like we want to secure the Israelis in the holy land to bring forth the rapture.

Just remember how America was won. It was damn near genocide.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 09-20-2005, 12:10 AM   #7 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
You're right. If we didn't support Israel, they would all be dead. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, et. al. have basically said that they want another holocaust. I think that it would be immoral if we didn't support Israel.
Yes, that is what I was implying about Israel. I just don't see what business we have being there. It is like we want to secure the Israelis in the holy land to bring forth the rapture.

Just remember how America was won. It was damn near genocide.
So you think it should just be survival of the fittest? I can't believe that you think it would be alright for the Arabs to kill off the Jews just for a little more land!
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-20-2005, 12:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,887
Country:
Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99 Points: 28,601, Level: 99
Level up: 16%, 1,399 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
You're right. If we didn't support Israel, they would all be dead. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, et. al. have basically said that they want another holocaust. I think that it would be immoral if we didn't support Israel.
Yes, that is what I was implying about Israel. I just don't see what business we have being there. It is like we want to secure the Israelis in the holy land to bring forth the rapture.

Just remember how America was won. It was damn near genocide.
So you think it should just be survival of the fittest? I can't believe that you think it would be alright for the Arabs to kill off the Jews just for a little more land!

Some battles we have no right being involved with. We can take the stance that neutral countries have done in the past and allow Israeli refugees to come to America. I think doing that would send a far greater message to the world about America's strength, character, and heart.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 09-20-2005, 12:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa

Just remember how America was won. It was damn near genocide.
It was hardly genocide: only 10,623 died, only 5.3% of the total population.
http://www.cwc.lsu.edu/cwc/other/stats/warcost.htm
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-20-2005, 12:20 AM   #10 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Some battles we have no right being involved with.
Unless we're asked...
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites