Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Environment
Environment Debate and defend the issues our world faces on topics such as global warming, environmental pollution, and the many proposals that might help solve these problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2007, 04:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts

Points: 5,366, Level: 47
Points: 5,366, Level: 47 Points: 5,366, Level: 47 Points: 5,366, Level: 47
Level up: 48%, 184 Points needed
Level up: 48% Level up: 48% Level up: 48%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Global Ecosystems 'Face Collapse'

Global Ecosystems 'Face Collapse'

BBC News
October 24, 2006

"Current global consumption levels could result in a large-scale ecosystem collapse by the middle of the century, environmental group WWF has warned.

The group's biannual Living Planet Report said the natural world was being degraded "at a rate unprecedented in human history".

Terrestrial species had declined by 31% between 1970-2003, the findings showed.

It warned that if demand continued at the current rate, two planets would be needed to meet global demand by 2050.

The biodiversity loss was a result of resources being consumed faster than the planet could replace them, the authors said.

They added that if the world's population shared the UK's lifestyle, three planets would be needed to support their needs.

The nations that were shown to have the largest "ecological footprints" were the United Arab Emirates, the United States and Finland.

Paul King, WWF director of campaigns, said the world was running up a "serious ecological debt".

"It is time to make some vital choices to enable people to enjoy a one planet lifestyle," he said.

"The cities, power plants and homes we build today will either lock society into damaging over-consumption beyond our lifetimes, or begin to propel this and future generations towards sustainable one planet living."

The report, compiled by the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Global Footprint Network, is based on data from two indicators:
  • Living Planet Index- assesses the health of the planet's ecosystems
  • Ecological Footprint- measures human demand on the natural world
The Living Planet Index tracked the population of 1,313 vertebrate species of fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals from around the world.

It found that these species had declined by about 30% since 1970, suggesting that natural ecosystems were being degraded at an unprecedented rate.

The Ecological Footprint measured the amount of biologically productive land and water to meet the demand for food, timber, shelter, and absorb the pollution from human activity.

The report concluded that the global footprint exceeded the earth's biocapacity by 25% in 2003, which meant that the Earth could no longer keep up with the demands being placed upon it.

The findings echo a study published earlier this month that said the world went into "ecological debt" on 9 October this year.

The study by UK-based think-tank New Economics Foundation (Nef) was based on the Ecological Footprint data compiled by the Global Footprint Network, which also provided the figures for this latest report from the WWF.

One of the report's editors, Jonathan Loh from the Zoological Society of London, said: "[It] is a stark indication of the rapid and ongoing loss of biodiversity worldwide.

"Populations of species in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems have declined by more than 30% since 1970," he added.

"In the tropics the declines are even more dramatic, as natural resources are being intensively exploited for human use."

The report outlined five scenarios based on the data from the two indicators, ranging from "business as usual" to "transition to a sustainable society".

Under the "business as usual" scenario, the authors projected that to meet the demand for resources in 2050 would be twice as much as what the Earth could provide.

They warned: "At this level of ecological deficit, exhaustion of ecological assets and large-scale ecosystem collapse become increasingly likely."

To deliver a shift towards a "sustainable society" scenario would require "significant action now" on issues such as energy generation, transport and housing.

The latest Living Planet Report is the sixth in a series of publications which began in 1998."

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Global ecosystems 'face collapse'

http://worldwildlife.org/about/lpr2004.pdf
baloney_detector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2007, 07:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Gender: Female
Posts: 834
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 3,659, Level: 38
Points: 3,659, Level: 38 Points: 3,659, Level: 38 Points: 3,659, Level: 38
Level up: 39%, 141 Points needed
Level up: 39% Level up: 39% Level up: 39%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Maybe they should rename the report to "Dying Planet Report".... unless we stop using so much natural resources, lower our birth rate, decrease per person consumption of consumer goods and services, and increase efficiency those goods and services are produced.
chrisg967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2007, 11:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts

Points: 5,366, Level: 47
Points: 5,366, Level: 47 Points: 5,366, Level: 47 Points: 5,366, Level: 47
Level up: 48%, 184 Points needed
Level up: 48% Level up: 48% Level up: 48%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisg967 View Post
Maybe they should rename the report to "Dying Planet Report".... unless we stop using so much natural resources, lower our birth rate, decrease per person consumption of consumer goods and services, and increase efficiency those goods and services are produced.
I'm an optimist.

So believe me when I say the future does not look bright for our planet...at least not for the ecological form it had been in before human civilization had arisen.

And I doubt that many species will survive our technological adolescence.

All those branches of the tree of life simply cut off in just a few generations of Man.


Last edited by baloney_detector; 03-25-2007 at 11:27 PM.
baloney_detector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 07:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,909
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Points: 14,720, Level: 78
Points: 14,720, Level: 78 Points: 14,720, Level: 78 Points: 14,720, Level: 78
Level up: 79%, 130 Points needed
Level up: 79% Level up: 79% Level up: 79%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
What is really scary about all this is that some refuse to even consider the evidence of human infuenced global warming, and the effects it will have on our enviroment, simply because of thier political alignment.
__________________
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
tyreay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites